1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ser-zykov [4K]
3 years ago
12

Imagine the Turkish government gives away scholarships to students looking to pursue engineering degrees. Which of the

History
1 answer:
DochEvi [55]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

A.

Explanation:

Human capital can be defined as economic value of skills or labor of a worker. It is an intangible assets that a company or country invest in. This includes education, health, skills, etc. This assets helps to increase productive ability of an employee or worker. Education is a human capital that many country invests in. As higher the educational rate will produce higher rates of economic growth.

<u>In the given case, Turkish government's decision to give away scholarships to engineering students is a human capital investment. Turkish government is investing in education which in turn will increase economic growth</u>.

Therefore, option A is correct.

You might be interested in
Germany invaded Denmark and Norway in 1940, allegedly to protect their freedom and independence
professor190 [17]
False. 
Germany invaded Denmark because Hitler wanted to use its air bases.
The invasion of Norway was mostly to gain the iron ore shipment from Narvik.
So Germany invaded Norway and Denmark for their resources.
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Did the number of countries classified as “free” rise or fall between 1972 and 2002?
cestrela7 [59]

Answer:

Explanation:

The value of political equality is central to normative theories of democracy: it is argued that women are equal citizens and therefore should share equally with men in public decision-making. By contrast, empirical theories typically define democracy by the presence of institutions such as a multi-party political system and competitive elections. In fact, the concept of empirical democracy may encompass a complex range of practical realities, including cultural, socio-economic, and political factors. This multifaceted understanding of empirical democracy is used to help explain the descriptive representation of women in national parliaments. The goal of the article is to advance understanding about which factors help or hinder women in entering parliament in countries defined as democratic. Its principal argument is that these factors differ according to the length of the democratic experiment. The analysis shows first that the proportion of women in parliaments is influenced by a plurality of interacting factors. Second, it shows that the mix of factors influencing the percentage of female legislators differs according to the length of the country's democratic experience. In countries where democracy has prevailed for only a short time, the voting system is the most important factor explaining the proportion of women parliamentarians. By contrast, in well-established democracies the most powerful explanation is found in an egalitarian conception of gender roles. The conclusions reminds us that empirical democracy is a complex, heterogeneous, and multifaceted phenomenon; consequently, analysis intended to reach a better understanding of the presence of women in parliaments must refrain from uniformly applying indicators to all countries, the realities of which are, in fact, quite different.

8 0
3 years ago
Which of the following is not the main contemporary of global issue
Alex_Xolod [135]

Answer:

Themes include democracy and human rights, nationalism and conditions of conflict and stability, economic globalization, resource distribution and depletion, responsibilities of international and transnational organizations, technological development and environmental concerns, cultural diversity and identity, and the ...

3 0
3 years ago
How/why did the United States of American erupt into the civil war
Arlecino [84]

Answer:

The Civil War started because of uncompromising differences between the free and slave states over the power of the national government to prohibit slavery in the territories that had not yet become states. ... The event that triggered war came at Fort Sumter in Charleston Bay on April 12, 1861.

7 0
3 years ago
How did stores change as technoloy improved?
Westkost [7]
D sorry if wrong D or B
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Does puerto rico participate in the olympics
    15·1 answer
  • How many farms were destroyed during the dust bowl?
    9·1 answer
  • What were the effects of world war one and world war two on social and cultural life in Nevada.
    9·2 answers
  • Which document outlines a plan for government that has served as a model for new governments around the world?
    5·2 answers
  • Why did Plato dislike Athenian democracy?
    8·1 answer
  • A result of the US recession that began in 2008 was a global recession. falling unemployment levels. higher job wages. banks mak
    5·1 answer
  • examine the extent to which the United State ecnomic foreign policy led to prosperity at home and aborad
    6·1 answer
  • What enabled President Truman and Allied leaders to issue the ultimatum above?
    13·2 answers
  • Part D <br> How does the argument differ from others you have read?
    12·2 answers
  • The national government and the federal government are two different levels of government.
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!