1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Damm [24]
3 years ago
14

Walter is the manager of sales operations at Woode Industries. He has to define the sales goals for the forthcoming financial ye

ar. In this scenario, which of the following guideline will help him in framing effective team goals for his sales team?
Business
1 answer:
Sloan [31]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

goals must be challenging, requiring hard work

Explanation:

Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that in this scenario the best guideline would be that the goals must be challenging, requiring hard work. Making the goals challenging would ensure that no one individual can do it by themselves, thus encouraging teamwork among the group, thus framing effective team goals.

You might be interested in
Briefly explain the differences between functional, matrix, and project organizations. Describe how each structure affects the m
denis-greek [22]

Answer

The classic function organisation, is a pecking order where every worker has one clearsuperior. Staff individuals are gathered by specialities, for example, generation, promoting, building, and accountingat the top level. Specialties might be additionally subdivided into centered useful units, for example, mechanical and electrical designing. Every department as an utilitarian association will do its venture work autonomously of different offices

Matrix organisation, mirror a mix of practical and projectized characteristics. Matrix organisation can be named feeble, adjusted, or solid relying upon the overall degree of intensity and impact among utilitarian and undertaking chiefs. Powerless framework associations keep up huge numbers of the qualities of a practical association, and the job of the venture director is even more an organizer or expediter.A venture expediter fills in as staff collaborator and correspondences facilitator. The expediter can't settle on or implement choices. Task facilitators have capacity to settle on certain choices, have some position, and report to a more elevated level supervisor. Solid framework associations have a large number of the attributes of the projectized association, and have full-time venture supervisors with extensive position and full-time venture regulatory staff. While the reasonable framework association perceives the requirement for a task supervisor, it doesn't give the venture administrator the full authority over the undertaking and venture financing.

In a projectized organisation, colleagues are regularly colocated. The greater part of the association's resources are engaged with venture work, and undertaking directors have a lot of freedom and authority. Virtualcollaboration strategies are regularly used to achieve the advantages of colocated groups. Projectized organizations often have authoritative units called divisions, however they can either report legitimately to the task director or provide bolster administrations to the different undertakings

How they affect the management

In a functional organisation, extends that exist inside a solitary useful division produce no specific authoritative issues, yet extends that cut across utilitarian divisions can be testing. Why? Tasks that stretch out across practical divisions are requesting to oversee on the grounds that the undertaking director has no direct utilitarian position and should get ceaseless collaboration and backing from useful supervisors of different divisions so as to meet venture goals. This can get confusing.

Since the matrix structure offers position to both venture administrators(project manager) and utilitarian directors(functional manager) the result is to give an increasingly consistent division of work and at last to construct a more grounded group culture. In any case, the potential for struggle between useful supervisors and task administrators still exists on the grounds that there is still asset strife. Everybody who is on a task group still has two supervisors – their practical director and their venture administrator.

In a projectised organisation authority is incorporated. Since ventures are expelled from useful divisions the lines of correspondence are abbreviated. Both these elements upgrade the capacity to settle on quick choices. Undertaking groups build up a solid feeling of character which thusly makes a significant level of responsibility from colleagues. Because of their contribution in successive ventures of a comparable sort projectised associations can create and keep up a long haul assortment of experience and aptitudes in explicit regions.

Obviously projectised organisation make it simpler to run ventures on the grounds that the whole structure is set up for that reason. However, on the off chance that you are dealing with a task inside other hierarchical structures, at that point perceiving and understanding the effects will raise your attention to the potential undertaking the board entanglements, so you can be proactive about settling them. Correspondence, compromise and group building will be vital to your prosperity.

8 0
3 years ago
Beto Company pays $4.70 per unit to buy a part for one of the products it manufactures. With excess capacity, the company is con
Anastasy [175]

Here, we are decide the best option between making the part or buying the part.

a.                  Make or Buy Analysis

Particulars                              Make amount    Buy amount

Direct Materials                            $4.50

Direct Labor                                $1.00  

Overhead (80% of Direct Labor)    $0.80  

Cost to buy                            <u>              </u>            <u>$4.70</u>

Cost per unit                              <u>$5.70    </u>          <u>$4.70</u>

Cost Difference = $5.70 - $4.70

Cost Difference = $1.00

Therefore, the cost difference of making amount over buying amount is $1.00.

b. Because of the difference, Beto should buy the part because its cost is lesser than to make the part.

Therefore, the buying of the part is the best decision.

See similar solution about Analysis

<em>brainly.com/question/23287319</em>

3 0
2 years ago
Select the correct answer from each drop-down menu,
Alik [6]

Answer:

C) property

A) direct tax

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Terry company had january 1 inventory of $100,000 when it adopted dollar-value lifo. during the year, purchases were $600,000 an
inna [77]

Answer:

Terry's Closing Inventory is $131,360.

Terry's Gross profit is $431,360.

We follow these steps to arrive at the answers:

<u>1. Calculate the base value of closing inventory (CI):</u>

CI_{base value} = \frac{CI*Index at base year}{current price index}

CI_{base value} = \frac{143360*100}{112} =  128,000

<u>2. Calculate additions to inventory at base price</u>

Additions to inventory = CI_{base value} - Beginning inventory

Additions to inventory = 128000 - 100000 = 28,000

<u>3. Calculate the value of additions to inventory at current prices</u>

Additions to inventory_{current Value} = Additions to inventory_{base Value} * \frac{current price index}{base price index}

Additions to inventory_{current Value} = 28,000 * \frac{112}{100} = 31,360

<u>4. Calculate the value of Closing inventory</u>

Closing inventory = Beginning Inventory + Additions to inventory_{current Value}

Closing inventory = 100,000 + 31,360 =  131,360

<u>5. Compute Cost of Goods Sold (COGS):</u>

COGS = Opening Inventory + Purchases - Closing Inventory

COGS = (100000 + 600000 - 131360) = 568640

<u>6. Compute Gross profit</u>

Gross profit = Sales - COGS

Gross profit = 1000000 - 568640 = 431360

5 0
3 years ago
A new sports car sells for $40,000. The value of the car decreases by 12% annually. After how many years will it be worth half o
Marysya12 [62]

Answer:

n= 6.11 years

Explanation:

Giving the following information:

Present value= $40,000

Future value= $20,000

Decrease rate= 0.12

<u>To calculate the number of years for the car to reach a value of $20,000; we need to use the following formula:</u>

n= ln(FV/PV) / ln(1+i)

n= ln(20,000/40,000) / ln(1.12)

n= 6.11 years

8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Your colleague anshul has to give a presentation to the whole company. what tip should you give him about managing his nerves?
    11·1 answer
  • DeLong Corporation was organized on January 1, 2017. It is authorized to issue 10,000 shares of 8%, $100 par value preferred sto
    9·1 answer
  • An investor buys an 8% municipal bond in the secondary market on a 10% basis. The investor does not accrete the bond discount an
    12·2 answers
  • Pooler Corporation is working on its direct labor budget for the next two months. Each unit of output requires 0.15 direct labor
    12·1 answer
  • Which of these are considered broad economic goals? Dependability, equity, efficiency Freedom, equity, growth Reliability, hones
    7·1 answer
  • When electra decided to produce its "pedal-assist" motor bike it had to adhere to speed regulations. the company found out, howe
    7·1 answer
  • The beginning balance on the monthly bank statement for Aretha's checking account was $462.79, and the ending balance was $256.0
    8·2 answers
  • How does the current organizational and operational structure, including the system of corporate governance, benefit the firm
    11·1 answer
  • Can you help me with compound inequalities <br><br>​
    11·1 answer
  • Second Chance Welding rebuilds spot welders for manufacturers. The following budgeted cost data for 2020 is available for Second
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!