All of the following are true of the united states senate except which of these?

Social Studies

2 answers:

Yuri [45]3 years ago

4 0

The correct answer is C. Senators do not choose who becomes a new senator. They are chosen by the people of that state.

Anika [276]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

The correct answer is C. It is not true that senators vote on who should fill vacant seats within the Senate.

Explanation:

The Senate is one of two chambers of Congress. The other is the House of Representatives. Each of the 50 states of the United States has two senators. Every two years, one-third of the senators are up for election, and an election period thus lasts six years for a senator. Originally, senators were appointed by the legislative assemblies of the states, but since 1913 the Constitution has prescribed direct elections.

In addition to ordinary legislative work, the Senate is responsible for signing or rejecting international treaties signed by the United States with other nations, and is responsible for approving ministers, ambassadors and judges nominated by the President of the United States.

You might be interested in

What makes chewing gum acceptable in your country and unacceptable in Singapore?

Alika [10]

Explanation:

Chewing gum is banned in Singapore under the Regulation of Imports and Exports (Chewing Gum) Regulations. ... One of the objectives of the ban was to prevent vandals from using spent chewing gums to disrupt Mass Rapid Transit (MRT) services.Jan 3, 1992

6 0

2 years ago

Why do social movements enlist the help of songwriters and well-known actors?

Llana [10]

B . To get there message across!

7 0

3 years ago

A person who enters or remains on the property with the occupant’s expressed or implied permission is called (a)n

antoniya [11.8K]

Answer:

invitee

Explanation:

According to my research on different property law terminology, I can say that based on the information provided within the question this is called an invitee. Mostly because the owner's of the property or house are inviting the individual to enter or remain in the property, if the owners did not invite the individual and wanted that individual to leave then the individual would be considered a trespasser.

I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.

4 0

3 years ago

This case is one example that helped to establish the “clear and present danger” doctrine in terms of an individual’s freedom of

nlexa [21]

The correct answer is letter A. <span>DeJonge v. Oregon was the case that established "clear and present danger" doctrine in terms of an individual's freedom of association. This was a case in the United States Supreme Court that the Constitution's 14th amendment applies to the freedom of assembly of its constituents.</span>

3 0

3 years ago

Why was obedience to the Roman Catholic pope judged to be evidence of obedience to government rulers during Spanish domination o

klemol [59]

I’m kinda slow but I have a brain please don’t judge me

5 0

3 years ago