Answer:
A)
Explanation:
The main difference between these two terms is that a concurring opinion agrees with the majority decision, but for different legal reasons, while a dissenting opinion explains why one or more justices disagree with the majority. Each of which tends to ocurr often in court cases where various judges analyze and pass judgment of another judges decision on a specific case. With a concurring opinion most, if not all, judges agree with the decision that has been made but tend to give different reasons as to why they believe the decision was justified.
False, I think they are motivated by independence.
I believe that if we had lost our economy would have plummeted, the US would look completely different, and there would be much stricter rules. <span />
Answer:
Explanation:
The work in the south was farming. To maintains these big farms you needed a lot of people to do the work. Since hiring people costs a lot of money they usually bought slaves to do the work for them because it was cost proficient. The north focused more on industry working and factories so people had a lot of jobs and there wasn't really a big need for slaves. That's why when the north wanted to abolish slavery the south didn't agree because most of their farms were maintained by slaves. Thus the Civil War happened.
