Answer:
(Competion____________ ) among buyers and sellers prohibits a single buyer or seller can dictate the price of a product or resource because others can undercut that price. The regulatory mechanism of the market system is ( competition___________ ). As the result, the ( _economic_________ ___power_____ ) is widely distributed. In other words, competition diffuses ( __economic________ ___power______ ) and limits the actions of any single seller or buyer.
Explanation:
Economic power refers to the ability of countries, businesses, or individuals to improve their standard of living, making decisions that benefit themselves alone, and reducing the ability of any outside force to reduce their freedom. Competition refers to the selling and buying of goods and services with others, who are also selling and buying the same goods and services. It balances economic power, preventing a single individual from monopolizing the market interaction.
Answer:
Article 2 of the UCC(Uniform Commercial Code).
Explanation:
UCC is said to be an acronym which stands for the Uniform Commercial Code; this is seen also to govern many different forms of contract interactions. Article 2 in most cases are seen to cover common issues ranging from
i). Goods definition of i.e any tangible item that can be moved.
ii). Situations involving missing terms in a contract, such as a missing quantity, price etc.
iii) Contract modifications and lastly
iv). Exchanges of consideration for items of value.
Alot of research has shown in most cases that article 2 is a popularly cited provision in this body of statutes, since it governs contracts for the sale of goods between merchants or between a merchant and a non-merchant.
Some advantages of walmart purchasing established web businesses are;
- Will help to draw to the site many consumers.
- The website will display more options for consumers to see.
<h3>What is a web businesses?</h3>
Web businesses can be regarded as the business that are been run online using website.
Therefore, walmart purchasing established web businesses so they can promote their brand to more consumers.
Learn more about web businesses at;
brainly.com/question/24448358
Answer:
Jones is liable to pay.
He is liable to pay to the tune of $1000. This may be negotiated however if it is not fair.
Explanation:
See the following points
- The question above is an example of Implied At-law contracts. (We will get to the definition of this in a bit).
- A contract is a legally binding agreement that recognises and governs the rights and duties of the parties to the agreement. A contract is legally enforceable because it meets the requirements and approval of<u> the Law</u>. From the above definition it is clear that two people may actually be engaging in a contract without knowing it.
- The law defines that a contract is.
- Contracts may be Express or Implied.
- Express contracts are simply contracts that are stated expressly, or openly, in either writing or orally, at the time of contract formation.
- Implied contracts are created when two or more parties have no written contract.
- There are two types of implied contracts:
- Implied In-Fact Contracts: these are contracts which create an obligation between the parties based on the facts of the situation. For example, assume your neighbor hires you to wash his car every Friday for the entire holidays. You wash your neighbor’s car for the first four weekends of the holidays and get paid on Friday morning each time. The fifth Friday you wash the car and when you arrive at your neighbor’s house for your pay, your neighbor refuses to pay you. The law will infer that there is a contract between you and your neighbor, even though you never put anything in writing. This is an implied in-fact contract.
2. The other type of Implied contract is that which is Implied At-Law
In the case between Jones and Smith, the law imposes a duty to perform a contract, and will enforce such a contract even against a person’s will, where the situation is such that without this legal intervention, one party would be <u>unfairly enriched</u> or advantaged by another party’s action.
- In the question above, Smith is a CPA. He is qualified in every respect to carry out Professional Tax services. His services may be relied upon with a great degree of confidence.
- If Jones had not filed those tax returns, he probably would have lost monies that should have accrued to him from the government.
This type of agreement is also considered a quasi-contract. A quasi-contract occurs where the law imposes an obligation upon the parties where in fact the parties did not intend to enter into a contract and made no promise to perform.
However, because one party would be unjustly enriched by another party’s action, the beneficiary of those actions must make restitution or pay fair value for the services provided, even though there was never any intention to enter into an agreement.
Cheers!
Answer: Martha does not have a dominant strategy
Explanation:
A dominant strategy is one that a player can embark on and get the highest payoff regardless of the actions of their competitor.
In this scenario, there is no strategy that Martha can embark on that would provide the greatest payout regardless of Oleg's decision. If Martha advertises, Oleg makes the same amount advertising as well. If Martha does not advertise, Oleg would decide not to advertise as well and make the same amount.
Martha therefore has no dominant strategy as Oleg would make the same amount regardless of which decision is taken.
