According to Carnegie, a rich person should relate to the poor as D. as an equal, like a brother or sister
<h3>How to illustrate the information?</h3>
Carnegie adhered to the "Gospel of Fortune," which held that affluent individuals had a moral responsibility to donate their wealth to other members of society. Before 1901, Carnegie had made a few charitable contributions, but after that, he turned to giving away money as his new career.
He stated that everyone is equal and that the rich should see the poor as being equal to them and help them when they can.
Therefore, according to to Carnegie, a rich person should relate to the poor as an equal, like a brother or sister
Learn more about rich on:
brainly.com/question/894192
#SPJ1
The Roman Republic<span>. ... The ladder to </span>political<span> power in the </span>Roman<span> Senate was different for the wealthy patricians than for the lower-class plebeians. It all began when the Romans overthrew their Etruscan conquerors in 509 B.C.E. Centered north of </span>Rome<span>, the Etruscans had ruled over the Romans for hundreds of years.</span>
It was the "Tartessos" that <span>was a kingdom on the Atlantic coast of Spain that traded with the Greeks and Phoenicians," although their trading capabilities were less than many of their partners. </span>
Answer:
The confession of faith
Explanation:
The pillar is the bridge between HEAVEN and EARTH, the vertical axis which both unites and divides these two realms. It is closely connected to the symbolism of the TREE; it also represents stability, and a broken pillar represents death and mortality.
Confession of faith, formal statement of doctrinal belief ordinarily intended for public avowal by an individual, a group, a congregation, a synod, or a church; confessions are similar to creeds, although usually more extensive. ... A brief treatment of confessions of faith follows.
Answer: Hello There!!
<em>
</em><em>Key Points</em>
<em>The Bill of Right’s provision on the freedom of speech was incorporated against the states in Gitlow v. New York (1925).</em>
<em>Core political speech, expressive speech, and most types of commercial speech are protected under the First Amendment.</em>
<em>Certain types of speech (particularly, speech that can h.arm others) is not protected, such as obscenity, fighting words, true threats, defamation, or invasion of privacy. Speech related to national security or state secrets may also not be protected.
</em><em>Freedom of Speech
</em><em>Freedom of speech in the United States is protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and by many state constitutions as well.</em>
<em />
<em>The freedom of speech is not absolute. The Supreme Court of the United States has recognized several categories of speech that are excluded, and it has recognized that governments may enact reasonable time, place, or manner restrictions on speech.</em>
<em />
<em>Critici-m of the government and advocacy of unpopular ideas that people may find distasteful or against public policy are almost always permitted. There are exceptions to these general protections. Within these limited areas, other limitations on free speech balance rights to free speech and other rights, such as rights for authors and inventors over their works and discoveries (copyright and patent), protection from imminent or potential violence against particular persons (restrictions on fighting words), or the use of untruths to harm others. Distinctions are often made between speech and other acts which may have symbolic significance.The freedom of speech is not absolute. The Supreme Court of the United States has recognized several categories of speech that are excluded, and it has recognized that governments may enact reasonable time, place, or manner restrictions on speech.
</em>
Explanation: I hope this helps!!
