1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
pychu [463]
2 years ago
5

Was the Declaration an objective and unbiased statement of the American-British conflict?

History
2 answers:
Vlada [557]2 years ago
8 0

The Declaration of Independence was <u>not</u> "objective and unbiased," because it strongly represented the position of the colonists over against the British.

The fact that the Declaration had a strong position favoring independence and against the British government doesn't mean that Thomas Jefferson, in authoring it, did not try to include some points of fact to support the position the colonies were asserting.  Jefferson provided a list of "facts to be submitted to a candid world" to demonstrate that the British king had been seeking to establish "an absolute Tyranny over these States" (the colonial states which were declaring their independence).  

Jefferson's list included items such as:

  • The king refused to assent to laws that were wholesome and necessary for the public good.
  • The king had forbidden colonial governors to enact laws or implement laws without his assent (which, as the prior point noted, he was in no hurry to give).
  • The king forced people to give up their rights to legislative assembly or forced legislative bodies to meet in difficult places that imposed hardships on them.
  • The king dissolved legislative assemblies and then refused for a long time to have other assemblies elected.
  • The king obstructed justice in the colonies and made judges dependent on his will alone for their salaries and their tenure in office.
  • The king kept standing armies in place in the colonies in peacetime, without the consent of the colonial legislatures.
  • The king imposed taxes without the colonists' consent.

These and additional items listed in the Declaration were meant to support the colonies' position that tyranny was standard operating procedure by the British monarchy, and therefore revolution was justified.

zlopas [31]2 years ago
7 0

No--the Declaration of Independence only represented the opinions of the Patriots.

The Declaration of Independence provides the Patriots version of how the American-British relationship was working. It declares their opinion of the King, taxation, and their lack of representation.

The Declaration of Independence was written to first express the grievances of the Patriots toward the King, George III. Though George responded, the responses were also biased and only represented the views of the King toward those rebelling. The actions of the Patriots didn't even represent all of the colonists. It was truly a slanted document representing northern colonists who were educated and often at least a middle class standing.

You might be interested in
BRAINLIEST!How were cultural traditions in Christianity transformed as the culture spread?
lana66690 [7]

Familiar Greek and Roman philosophical traditions were reconciled with Christianity as the educated Roman classes converted.

I'm not positive though.

5 0
3 years ago
What was one difference between President Kennedy and previous leaders? a. his wealthy background
ozzi

Correct answer choice is:


b. his great personal charm


President Kennedy's versatile response strategy was meant to assist the U.S. so as to reply to varies threats for the American nation. In his address, United States President challenged Americans to "ask what you'll do for your country. It absolutely was he who arrange geared toward raising the economy, fighting favoritism, and exploring space.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What did the federal road act authorize?
Kobotan [32]
The act authorized<span> a joint congressional committee to prepare a report on the issues involved in providing </span>federal<span> aid for highways. The post </span>road<span> program </span>was<span> plagued with problems.</span>
7 0
3 years ago
How did Stalin get so much power? What was his plan
harkovskaia [24]

Answer:

He gain power

Explanation:

He gains power after Lien passed away. But the crazy thing is Lein said DO NOT LET STALIN GET IN POWER. Stalin ends up in power anyway. His plan was to spread communism around the world and even take more land.

4 0
2 years ago
Who was the first president of nepal?<br><br> 1.Bhimsen Thapa 2.Ram Varan Yadav​
d1i1m1o1n [39]

Answer:

2

Explanation:

goooooooooooogle

3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What happened to give the “trail of the cross” it’s name ?
    5·1 answer
  • What were the benefits of the transportation revolution?
    8·1 answer
  • Who was able to stay in power in south vietnam with the support of the united states?
    7·1 answer
  • How did the oil embargo affect the prices of goods?
    9·1 answer
  • The term BC/BCE refers to
    15·2 answers
  • The purpose of the Small Business Administration is to ______________________________________
    15·1 answer
  • Need help with this asap.
    10·1 answer
  • Helppppp pls it’s Econ
    8·2 answers
  • Please help test due today
    12·2 answers
  • Discuss how this decline in productivity and economic growth would affect the stability of the soviet union.
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!