1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
pychu [463]
3 years ago
5

Was the Declaration an objective and unbiased statement of the American-British conflict?

History
2 answers:
Vlada [557]3 years ago
8 0

The Declaration of Independence was <u>not</u> "objective and unbiased," because it strongly represented the position of the colonists over against the British.

The fact that the Declaration had a strong position favoring independence and against the British government doesn't mean that Thomas Jefferson, in authoring it, did not try to include some points of fact to support the position the colonies were asserting.  Jefferson provided a list of "facts to be submitted to a candid world" to demonstrate that the British king had been seeking to establish "an absolute Tyranny over these States" (the colonial states which were declaring their independence).  

Jefferson's list included items such as:

  • The king refused to assent to laws that were wholesome and necessary for the public good.
  • The king had forbidden colonial governors to enact laws or implement laws without his assent (which, as the prior point noted, he was in no hurry to give).
  • The king forced people to give up their rights to legislative assembly or forced legislative bodies to meet in difficult places that imposed hardships on them.
  • The king dissolved legislative assemblies and then refused for a long time to have other assemblies elected.
  • The king obstructed justice in the colonies and made judges dependent on his will alone for their salaries and their tenure in office.
  • The king kept standing armies in place in the colonies in peacetime, without the consent of the colonial legislatures.
  • The king imposed taxes without the colonists' consent.

These and additional items listed in the Declaration were meant to support the colonies' position that tyranny was standard operating procedure by the British monarchy, and therefore revolution was justified.

zlopas [31]3 years ago
7 0

No--the Declaration of Independence only represented the opinions of the Patriots.

The Declaration of Independence provides the Patriots version of how the American-British relationship was working. It declares their opinion of the King, taxation, and their lack of representation.

The Declaration of Independence was written to first express the grievances of the Patriots toward the King, George III. Though George responded, the responses were also biased and only represented the views of the King toward those rebelling. The actions of the Patriots didn't even represent all of the colonists. It was truly a slanted document representing northern colonists who were educated and often at least a middle class standing.

You might be interested in
What was significant about the drafting of France’s first constitution? A. It put into practice the concepts of constitutional m
Morgarella [4.7K]
The Significant portal of the photo of the oxygen is H2O also the Cold War update is really knew so the 678 so also I never knew how PCs work on the PC Chromebook world but then I was among us imposter so that was working
5 0
3 years ago
How many states were admitted to the union by 1900
ra1l [238]

Answer:

45 States

Explanation:

The first states to ratify the U.S. Constitution were Delaware, Pennsylvania and New Jersey, in December 1787, and they were joined by the remainder of the thirteen ex-British colonies by 1790. Another three states joined before the turn of the nineteenth century, and there were 45 states by 1900.

6 0
3 years ago
How was Charlemagne able to expand his empire?
Solnce55 [7]


He expanded his empire by war. Invading and conquering other kingdoms.

Hope this helps. :)

3 0
3 years ago
What kind of strategy did the Bush campaign use in the 1988 election?
nasty-shy [4]
<span>He used the Strategic Defense Initiative to avoid conflict</span>
5 0
3 years ago
People are said to be part of the same ethnic group if they share the same
Lemur [1.5K]

Answer:

C. culture

Explanation:

So to explain this we have a county. This pocket of the country has all the same genetics, but this, lets say fourth of the pocket, values different things, dresses different, is just different. If you were in that group, you would be part of THAT ethical group.

Hope that answers your question.  

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Protests against the Vietnam War gave momentum to the development of which of these movements?
    6·1 answer
  • How did the US government pay for the war effort during World War II
    10·1 answer
  • First congress establishes ________ executive departments?
    10·1 answer
  • What instigated the United State's decision to launch an attack on Iraq in 2003?
    15·1 answer
  • Contrast the way that information about Native Americans is organized in “Native American Homes” with the way that information a
    8·1 answer
  • What was the purposes of "killing centers"?
    6·1 answer
  • I WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST PLEASE SERIOUS ANSWERS
    15·2 answers
  • What is Reaganomics? Explain the goal of this plan.
    13·1 answer
  • NEED ANSWER NOW
    6·2 answers
  • Who was the California Governor who ended school segregation in the state and would eventually become Chief Justice of the Supre
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!