1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
pychu [463]
3 years ago
5

Was the Declaration an objective and unbiased statement of the American-British conflict?

History
2 answers:
Vlada [557]3 years ago
8 0

The Declaration of Independence was <u>not</u> "objective and unbiased," because it strongly represented the position of the colonists over against the British.

The fact that the Declaration had a strong position favoring independence and against the British government doesn't mean that Thomas Jefferson, in authoring it, did not try to include some points of fact to support the position the colonies were asserting.  Jefferson provided a list of "facts to be submitted to a candid world" to demonstrate that the British king had been seeking to establish "an absolute Tyranny over these States" (the colonial states which were declaring their independence).  

Jefferson's list included items such as:

  • The king refused to assent to laws that were wholesome and necessary for the public good.
  • The king had forbidden colonial governors to enact laws or implement laws without his assent (which, as the prior point noted, he was in no hurry to give).
  • The king forced people to give up their rights to legislative assembly or forced legislative bodies to meet in difficult places that imposed hardships on them.
  • The king dissolved legislative assemblies and then refused for a long time to have other assemblies elected.
  • The king obstructed justice in the colonies and made judges dependent on his will alone for their salaries and their tenure in office.
  • The king kept standing armies in place in the colonies in peacetime, without the consent of the colonial legislatures.
  • The king imposed taxes without the colonists' consent.

These and additional items listed in the Declaration were meant to support the colonies' position that tyranny was standard operating procedure by the British monarchy, and therefore revolution was justified.

zlopas [31]3 years ago
7 0

No--the Declaration of Independence only represented the opinions of the Patriots.

The Declaration of Independence provides the Patriots version of how the American-British relationship was working. It declares their opinion of the King, taxation, and their lack of representation.

The Declaration of Independence was written to first express the grievances of the Patriots toward the King, George III. Though George responded, the responses were also biased and only represented the views of the King toward those rebelling. The actions of the Patriots didn't even represent all of the colonists. It was truly a slanted document representing northern colonists who were educated and often at least a middle class standing.

You might be interested in
The middle east is also called
amm1812

Answer: Middle east can also be called Mideast.

Explanation:

Middle + east = Mideast

Hope this helped!

5 0
3 years ago
What r these 2 i cant get then and i need them bad
IgorLugansk [536]
The first one is C and the second one is B.

Hope this helps! :)
4 0
3 years ago
When did Ghana experience the eclipse of the sun for the first time
pentagon [3]
It was in 1947 and they were a bit confused why it happened

5 0
3 years ago
How many grievances are listed in the Declaration of Independence?
Grace [21]

Answer:

twenty-seven

Explanation:

Because that's how many there are.

7 0
3 years ago
My question is the picture
Gnesinka [82]

The correct answer is A. Interview more soldiers who fought during the battle and compare their answers

Explanation:

In general terms, historical events can be better understood by using firs-hand accounts or primary sources. This means to know what happened at an event the best is to look for documents or sources made by those who directly experienced the events, which includes testimonies. In this context, the best for this historian is to interview soldiers who participated in the battle and use this information to better understand the story, including which side fired first (Option A.)

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is intentionalism
    9·2 answers
  • The relationship between the French and most Native Americans could initially be described as
    9·1 answer
  • Which describes the Anasazi or ancestral Pueblo Indians of the Southwest? A. lived in cliffside caves or adobe dwellings B. live
    15·2 answers
  • Was initially embraced by soviet leader joseph stalin, who viewed it more favorably than capitalism.
    10·1 answer
  • Why does President Obama oppose many free trade agreements?
    9·2 answers
  • How did the Borders of Texas Change as a result of the u.s. War with Mexico in a compromise of 1850
    15·1 answer
  • Contrasting Reliable and Unreliable sources
    14·1 answer
  • I NEED THIS DONE LIKE RIGHT NOW LIKE I NEED IT DONE WILL GIVE BRAINLEST
    13·1 answer
  • How did the government of Japan change during the NARA period?
    13·1 answer
  • What was the Iron Curtain during the Cold War?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!