1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
pychu [463]
3 years ago
5

Was the Declaration an objective and unbiased statement of the American-British conflict?

History
2 answers:
Vlada [557]3 years ago
8 0

The Declaration of Independence was <u>not</u> "objective and unbiased," because it strongly represented the position of the colonists over against the British.

The fact that the Declaration had a strong position favoring independence and against the British government doesn't mean that Thomas Jefferson, in authoring it, did not try to include some points of fact to support the position the colonies were asserting.  Jefferson provided a list of "facts to be submitted to a candid world" to demonstrate that the British king had been seeking to establish "an absolute Tyranny over these States" (the colonial states which were declaring their independence).  

Jefferson's list included items such as:

  • The king refused to assent to laws that were wholesome and necessary for the public good.
  • The king had forbidden colonial governors to enact laws or implement laws without his assent (which, as the prior point noted, he was in no hurry to give).
  • The king forced people to give up their rights to legislative assembly or forced legislative bodies to meet in difficult places that imposed hardships on them.
  • The king dissolved legislative assemblies and then refused for a long time to have other assemblies elected.
  • The king obstructed justice in the colonies and made judges dependent on his will alone for their salaries and their tenure in office.
  • The king kept standing armies in place in the colonies in peacetime, without the consent of the colonial legislatures.
  • The king imposed taxes without the colonists' consent.

These and additional items listed in the Declaration were meant to support the colonies' position that tyranny was standard operating procedure by the British monarchy, and therefore revolution was justified.

zlopas [31]3 years ago
7 0

No--the Declaration of Independence only represented the opinions of the Patriots.

The Declaration of Independence provides the Patriots version of how the American-British relationship was working. It declares their opinion of the King, taxation, and their lack of representation.

The Declaration of Independence was written to first express the grievances of the Patriots toward the King, George III. Though George responded, the responses were also biased and only represented the views of the King toward those rebelling. The actions of the Patriots didn't even represent all of the colonists. It was truly a slanted document representing northern colonists who were educated and often at least a middle class standing.

You might be interested in
The constitutional question At the heart of US v. Nixon is Best described as
alexandr1967 [171]
<span>whether laws had been broken during the Watergate incident.</span>
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which were ancient Chinese advancements in weaponry and warfare?
natka813 [3]

Answer:

I believe it's two, gunpowder and crossbow

Explanation:

The soonest realized crossbows were designed in the main thousand years BC, not later than the seventh century BC in old China, not later than the fourth century BC in Greece (as the gastraphetes).

Gunpowder was developed in China at some point during the main thousand years AD. The most punctual conceivable reference to gunpowder showed up in 142 AD during the Eastern Han administration when the chemist Wei Boyang, otherwise called the "father of speculative chemistry", expounded on a substance with black powder like properties.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In the United States, what role does the government play in the economic system?
mixer [17]
The government plays the role of promoting economic growth and stability of a country. It does this by providing legal and policy frameworks, a stable environment for business and investing in manpower and infrastructure. 

In short, the government enforces economic laws and regulations. 

Good luck :)
8 0
3 years ago
Describe one way colleges changed in the later 1800s.
Mashcka [7]

Answer: Colleges changed because slavery ended.

Explanation: Slavery ended on September 22, 1862. Because of this, African-Americans were allowed to start attending colleges.

I HOPE THIS HELPS!!! PLEASE MARK ME BRAINLIEST!!! I ONLY HAVE 1!!!!

6 0
3 years ago
What is the supreme law of the land?
ser-zykov [4K]

Answer:

The answer is the third option  Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The search for what natural resource encouraged explorers to come to the area that is now South Carolina? a)diamonds 
    6·1 answer
  • Which of these actions strongly influenced Western European culture?
    12·2 answers
  • The Homestead Act of 1862 impacted American Indians by
    6·2 answers
  • When the war officially started in 1938, did America join right away?
    5·1 answer
  • What were the Quakers also known as
    9·1 answer
  • How does cost-benefit analysis help make economic decisions?
    5·1 answer
  • Which statement best describes life for the Israelites under Roman rule?
    11·2 answers
  • Impeach means to __________.
    9·2 answers
  • In your opinion, how did dictators use the Great Depression to their advantage?
    11·1 answer
  • Este tipo de pinturas los seres humanos reprodujeron escenas de la vida cotidiana(como la
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!