Answer:
They didn't do much at all to help anything besides speed up the Civil War. Each act or compromise just pushed the divide between the north and the south even more apart
Explanation:
Answer:
1. Columbus is worthy of celebration by all Americans because he represents our ancestry.
2. Celebrating Columbus Day is a continuous way of saying "We're proud to be Americans, and equally proud of our Italian heritage and ancestry."
3. 57 percent of Americans believe that it's a good idea to have a holiday named for him.
4. Columbus was a man whose approach to the native people he met during his first voyage was exemplary, taking delight in their friendliness and happy demeanor.
5. He practically defines our understanding of the spirit of discovery is himself worth rediscovering, and worth teaching, with both truth and objectivity.
They mostly believed that women would become political and devoted to causes and participating in politics which would lead them to abandon their duties towards their homes which was mostly about things like chores and being a housewife. This was the common belief among anti-suffragists, but there were also radicals who believed even worse things.
Answer:
The Supreme Court decision that decided the 2000 Presidential Election should go down in history as one of the court's most ill-conceived judgments. In issuing its poorly-reasoned ruling in Bush v. Gore, the court majority unnecessarily exposed itself to charges of partisanship and risked undermining the court's stature as an independent, impartial arbiter of the law. Although the court majority correctly identified constitutional problems in the specific recount proceedings ordered by the Florida Supreme Court, the decision to end all recount attempts did immeasurable damage to the equal protection rights the court claimed to be guarding, since it favored a convenient and timely tabulation of ballots over an accurate recording of the vote. In the controversy that followed this decision, some critics of the majority decision argued that the court had no business taking on Bush v. Gore in the first place, that it should have remained solely within the Florida courts (Ginsburg, J. [Dissent] Bush v. Gore [2000]). This paper will argue that the court was correct to intervene but that umm the resulting decision was flawed and inconsistent, with potentially serious, adverse implications for the Federal judiciary if the court continues to issue rulings in this way.
Explanation:
The Protestant threat
Teresa of Avila
the Council of Trent
the Bible as the sole source of truth
salvation through faith alone
Church reform
Catholic reformation refers to the period when catholicism started to resurface as a response for protestant reformation.The reformation effort was consisted of 5 major elements and started in the year of 1545 and ended in the year of 1648 after thirty years of war.