Answer:
No
Explanation:
In this article, it is argued that 25% of residents of Texas do not have health insurance. However, in the study it was found that 51 out of 240 were uninsured. This represents a 21.25%. However, this is not enough evidence to dismiss the claim made in the article. 240 people is a small number, and this small sample is unlikely to be a good representation of the population of Texas at large. Moreover, even if we were to take this study into account, it is likely that we would need to repeat the experiment several times and in different locations in order to be able to have a more complete picture of healthcare in Texas.
Answer:
ego
Explanation:
The ego is a concept that Freud included in his theory of psychonysis.
Accordingly, the ego is the part of the personality that mediates the demands of the id (psychic expression of our drives and desires), the superego and reality. In this sense, it not only prevents us from acting according to our basic impulses (created by it), but also works to achieve a balance with our moral and idealistic standards (created by the superego).
As far as I could find, the following were a feature of the reformin 1996:
increased work requirements (especially after two years)
a five-year limit on benefits from federal funds
So these were definitely a feature.
Of the remaining two, it is true that the cash assistance was diminished in 1996.
So i think that the transportation vouchers were not provided. Additionally, I found that transportation costs can be deducted from taxes by the employers, and that there is a number of smaller programs providing transportation benefits, but I don't think that they were a major part of the reform (so the last option).
Answer:
Savagery was fire, the bow and arrow, and pottery. Barbarism was the domestication of animals, agriculture, and metalworking and the alphabet and writing were the civilization stage.
Explanation:
write in point kk
There are definitely pros and cons to all of them
local leaders are closer to the people, but might not make a curriculum strong enough for students to succeed in other areas
states are a better option, but still would have different things taught than other states
the federal government would make a curriculum thats used nationwide, so everybody is educated on the same topic, but depending on what political party is in the gov, education could be skewed to make kids believe party beliefs.
personally I think either the states or the federal gov is the best choice to make decisions about what students learn and how they’re tested
