After a procedur has been completed, some questions can be asked to help evaluate the results. Here are these questions:
1. Were the steps completed in order?
- This is important to ask because it may be necessary to change the order the next time the procedure is done.
2. What could be done differently in the future?
- This is important to ask because it can find problems with the procedure that was done to improve for the next one.
3. Was the expected outcome reached?
- If the expected outcome wasn't reached maybe the procedure shouldn't be repeated. Unless of course the surprise outcome was something good.
Answer:
um.. things are way different in storys than reality
Explanation:
Hello. This question is incomplete. The full question is:
Read the introduction.
The United States Department of Agriculture has historically published recommendations for healthy eating based on a food pyramid. This concept has been reimagined with the introduction of their new website www.choosemyplate.gov. This interactive website allows individuals to explore healthy menus tailored to their particular needs. The website also provides information about physical activity, caloric intake, and food groups.
What is the author's purpose? To inform readers about a government website to inform readers about the major food groups to persuade readers to change their diets to persuade readers to improve exercise habits
Answer:
to inform readers about a government website
Explanation:
The text shown in the question above is literally presenting a website developed and provided by the government to provide information that will be relevant, beneficial and progressive for the population. Thus, we can say that the purpose of the author of the text was to promote the dissemination of this website, making the population aware of it and can use it in the best possible way.
burr and hamilton join washington in defeating the british
lin manuel miranda's hamilton
The purpose of a counter argument in a persuasive text is to address any doubts the reader may have regarding the author's claim by refuting any possible flaws or opposing notions.
