Answer:
Vigor, bitterness, priceless
Explanation:
Vigor means physical strength and in good help. So when the poet says "Her vigor flows like tides in my blood." It emphasises the fact that her well-being is very important to him.
Bitterness in this poem is used to describe the bread that he was given. It can also be used to describe how is being treated and how it isn't very nice. I know this because the author of the poem uses the word bitter. When something is bitter it doesn't have a very appealing taste.
The author uses the word priceless to describe the treasure that is sinking beneath the sand. It means that if the treasure is lost it may never be found again so the author can use this powerful word to associate it with the fact that this object may never be found again.
Answer:
words that mean exactly what they say
Explanation:
brainliest plz
Answer:
''Polar Opposites'' has two stanzas which have no regular pattern of rhythm. Free verse poetry can include lines that rhyme, but the rhyme will not be consistent or patterned, thus making the poem a free verse poem.
Explanation:
Put this in your own words it will come up copy written, they can see these when they do the plagiarism searches
Rhetorical devices have the effect of persuading readers, causing them to adopt the ideas of the author of the text.
<h3>Most common rhetorical devices and their effects.</h3>
- Logos: Reinforces logical arguments.
- Pathos: Reinforces sentimental and emotional arguments.
- Ethos: Reinforces ethical arguments.
The use of these resources makes the text richer and extends the author's persuasion, so the author can shape the reader's thoughts, making him or her support the cheerleading or reject it and see it incorrectly.
You did not inform the text to which this question refers, which makes it impossible for me to see which rhetorical resource is used. However, I hope the above information can help you.
More information about rhetorical resources at the link:
brainly.com/question/25844206
Hope this is sort of what you were going for! :)
The destruction of any public property, be it statues or historical buildings, is completely unjustifiable. Not only does destroying these artifacts not benefit anyone, but it hurts countless people. From public workers, who'd have to either rebuild or clean up the destroyed property, to people with connections to the monuments having to deal with the losses, no one is benefited by blatant acts of destruction such as these. And, arguably, not even those who commit them.
