1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
puteri [66]
3 years ago
7

What was the relationship among human foragers and the environment/nature, and how was it different from our relationships to ot

her humans today and to our environment?
In relation to "This Fleeting World"
Advanced Placement (AP)
1 answer:
ASHA 777 [7]3 years ago
3 0

The relationship between the human foragers and the environment was much different than the one of the modern times. The foragers where directly dependent on the environment for their survival. They were not producing anything, so they were using the environment to get food and all the resources they needed. Nowadays, the relationship between the humans and the environment is much different, as most of the humans are directly dependent on the environment for the survival. This has led to have much less appreciation of it and very often even destroying it. The humans' relationship with the environment nowadays is much more recreational, scientific, or to use it for their further development.

You might be interested in
Geometry perpendicular lines .
Allisa [31]

Answer:

#1. x = 9

#2. y = 25

#3. x = 16

#4. x = 4.5

5 0
3 years ago
Explain the concepts of standardization and test norms
Gre4nikov [31]

Test norms consist of data that make it possible to determine the relative standing of an individual who has taken a test. By itself, a subject's raw score (e.g., the number of answers that agree with the scoring key) has little meaning. ... Norms provide a basis for comparing the individual with a group.

plz mark me as brainliest if this helped :)

3 0
3 years ago
I can’t figure this problem out
Natalka [10]

Answer:

Explanation:

Alright so the way to do this is to use properties of integrals to make our life easier.

So we have:

\int\limits^4_1 {(3f(x)+2)} \, dx

So lets break this up into two different integrals that represent the same area.

\int\limits^4_0 {f(x)} \, dx - \int\limits^1_0 {f(x)} \, dx = \int\limits^4_1 {f(x)} \, dx

Lets think about what is going on up there. The integral from four to zero gives us the area under the curve of f(x) from four to zero. If we subtract this from the integral from one to zero (the area under f from one to zero) we are left with the area under f from four to one! Hence:

\int\limits^4_1 {f(x)} \, dx

But since we have these values we can say that:

-3 - 2 = -5

Which means that \int\limits^4_1 {f(x)} \, dx = -5

So now we can evaluate \int\limits^4_1 {(3f(x)+2)} \, dx

Lets first break up our integrand into two integrals

\int\limits^4_1 {(3f(x)+2)} \, dx = 3\int\limits^4_1{f(x)} \, dx + 2\int\limits^4_1 {} \, dx

Now we can evaluate this:

We know that \int\limits^4_1 {f(x)} \, dx = -5

So:

3(-5)+2[x] where x is evaluated at 4 to 1 so

-15 + 2(3)

So we are left with -15 + 6 = -9

5 0
3 years ago
Explain federalism and the powers of the state in a constitutional context.<br><br> help!
Vanyuwa [196]

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Although there are no options attached, we can say the following.

Under the United States Constitution, the concept of federalism means that there is a division of powers between state and national governments,.

Under this constitutional division, the country is governed by one federal government and state governments. They have a direct relationship and sometimes they have encountered some conflicts due to the application of legislation.

The federal government is dived into three branches. The executive branch is the President of the United States. The legislative branch that is the Congres divided into two chambers. The upper chamber or Senate, and the lower chamber or House of Representatives. And finally, the judicial power that is the US Supreme Justice.

These three branches work under the system of checks and balances, which means that none of the three have more power than the others.

The states have a similar structure.

8 0
3 years ago
PLZZZ HELPPPP
poizon [28]

Answer:

Brutus, No. 1. The Anti-Federalist Robert Yates of New York wrote this essay under the penname “Brutus” in 1787. Like other opponents of the proposed U.S. constitution, “Brutus” accepted the conventional wisdom that republics had to be small and homogeneous—not large and diverse—in order to be successful. The essay argued against a strong central government based on the belief that it would not be able to meet the needs of all US citizens.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Please Help<br>Show Work​
    11·2 answers
  • URGENT(AP WRLD HISTORY):
    15·2 answers
  • It is most economically and environmentally sound to focus water resource management on:
    15·1 answer
  • Following a comparative dental identification Victor found that the postmortem and antemortem data were a complete mismatch. Whi
    13·1 answer
  • ) In recent decades, as the wealth of the United States has increased, the quality of the environment in the United States
    11·1 answer
  • ano ano ang dapat tandaan sa pamamalengke? ano ano ang mga dapat tandaan sa pamimili ng sariwang pagkain? ano ano ang mga sangka
    9·1 answer
  • HURRY IM ON TEST
    5·1 answer
  • Who is smarter me or albert eistin
    14·2 answers
  • Choose two quotations that express central ideas of the text? From “Bitcoins are a form of digital currency, a kind of money tha
    15·1 answer
  • Why were most slaves in the atlantic system taken from west and central africa
    10·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!