Answer:
$2.00
Explanation:
Since there was an increase of 30% from 2009, Allen Lumber Company's earnings after taxes for 2010 were:

The total number of shares in 2010 was:

Earnings per share for 2010 are determined by dividing total earnings by the number of shares:

Earnings per share for the year 2010 were $2.00.
Answer: Candidates are not getting timely feedback about their applications.
Explanation:
From the information provided in the question, we realize that Antoine has a team of knowledgeable, and ethical recruiters at Luvia Insurance.
Despite this, Antoine observed that the number of applicants who accept offers has reduced and he realized that developed an unfavorable opinion of Luvia Insurance.
The most likely reason for this is that the candidates do not getting timely feedback about their applications. In a case whereby this occurs, the applicants would go to other companies who have reviewed their applications quicker and they've gotten a feedback from on time.
Answer: B. Capital leases do not transfer ownership of the asset under the lease, but operating leases often do.
Explanation:
When using Capital Leases, the lessee will record the lease as if it were their own asset and as a result will also depreciate it. The lessee will also create a long term liability on their balance sheet for the asset.
Capital leases usually also involve a transfer of ownership to the lessee at the end of the lease term. Operating Leases on the other hand do not have these features. They are more like a rental of an asset and as such are recorded as a rental expense in the books of the lessee. The ownership remains with the lessor in an Operating Lease and the asset will be returned once the lease period is over.
True, profits of a large corporation are taxed twice, once a corporate income and again as personal income of stockholders. This is because the corporation is taxed when they earn the profit but then the stockholders are taxed as it is paid out as income/earnings.
Answer:
b. adult literacy; infant mortality
Explanation:
Multiple choice <em>"life expectancy; internet usage
; adult literacy; infant mortality
; infant mortality; adult literacy
; access to clean water; life expectancy"</em>
<em />
Higher real GDP per capita would imply higher literacy rate and at the same time lower infant mortality as citizens would invest more in health and education. All the other options are wrong as higher real GDP per capita cannot lead to lower life expectancy or literacy rate.