Answer:
b. connected them to their homelands
Explanation:
No
This is because the prisoners pay for their wrongs
Answer:
C, no because he was trespassing
Explanation:
The teenager was trespassing on somebody else's property and his action will not prevail in court. The general rule is : if somebody is trespassing on your property, you are not responsible for any injury occurring there.
<em>Dog owners must prove that the victim of the attack was illegally on the property to avoid liability.</em>
A 'Beware of the dog' sign does not remove liability from the dog's owner, it is only a warning.
The teenager was trespassing and the landowner is therefor not liable for his injuries.
Stefan Löfven, now Prime Minister of Sweeden, studied social work at Umeå University, but dropped out after a year and a half.
Then, he started a welding course and after Military service, he began his career as a welder and he started getting into unions and politics.
In a mixed-motive case, the defendant acknowledges that some discriminatory motive existed but argues that the same hiring decision would have been reached even without the discriminatory motive
This is further explained below.
<h3>What is
a mixed-motive case?</h3>
Generally, A case of employment discrimination in which there is proof that the respondent employer has valid grounds in addition to discriminatory reasons for adopting a specific negative employment action
In conclusion, In a case with mixed motives, the defendant admits that there was at least some discriminatory intent, but contends that the same employment choice would have been made even if there hadn't been any discriminatory intent.
Read more about the mixed-motive case
brainly.com/question/13122333
#SPJ1
