I believe they were loyalists
In the name, you can find the root word, loyal, which means to stay with a certain cause or a person
Answer: The situation is unconstitutional because it is defamation or libel
Explanation: The freedom of the press is guaranteed by the First Amendment of the American Constitution, which regulates all the rights and obligations of the media, including the press. This means that everyone has the right to freely report and write, and freely express their opinions without censorship. However, there are some limitations when it comes to press freedom. There are, among other things, the extent to which the journalist, i.e the writer of the article, can secure the protection of a confidential source, then also indecency. In this our case it is defamation which, when it comes to defamation in the press, calls libel. If Nancy wanted to make up a story about a politician she personally dislikes, then it is defamation. The First Amendment also does not guarantee the journalist the right to interfere personal feelings about the politician with professional writing in the newspaper. This means that if Nancy made up the story of a politician without real evidence of any wrongdoing, then it was defamation in the newspaper, therefore, libel.
Answer:
off the coast of New England colonial region which includes New Hampshire, Massachusetts Bay, Rhode Island, and Connecticut
Explanation:
Answer:
The third option: "A college student... in which he feels the national government needs improvement."
Explanation:
All of the other options break the law according to the freedom of speech. People are allowed the freedom of speech, but of course we can't say whatever we want. The rest of them are illegal, while the third is just an opinion, which are protected under the freedom of speech.