<u>Let's compare the statements with the debates on immigration happening today</u>
- <em>Nativists tried to get rid of the immigrants as they thought they were going to ruin the U.S. </em>
Such ideas definitely still present nowadays. There is a big political stream which bases its policy proposals on limiting immigration flows, as they claim that those people who are arriving in the country are the ones to blame for the miseries that some US people are experiencing in their lives, for example, one argument that is constantly repeated is that immigrants come and steal jobs from US workers.
For example, the current US goverment leaded by D. Trump is trying to approve in Congress a measure to built a wall in the Mexican border to prevent people from crossing ilegally. Therefore, nativist policies are not very far away.
- <em>Immigrants continued to dream and they tried really hard to find good paying jobs and live the life.</em>
On the other hand, the ones who are actually living in misery in their home countries are those who arrive at the US borders seeking for a better life. No matter how many barriers they encounter in the way anything is better than the violence or poverty they were facing back home, and therefore they will not give up.
An example are the large groups of people who are travelling on foot from Honduras towards the US, scaping from the country with more violence in the world, seeking for a safe and prosperous life. They have probably heard the threats of D. Trump's goverment, saying that they would not be allowed to enter in the country, but still they continue on their way with a fixed purpouse.
Answer:
Explanation:
While a metaphor is limited in length, an extended metaphor is developed over the course of a poem.
llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
It inspired more revolutions. An example is the French Revolution.
Answer: It caused the Roman empire to have a small and weak army.
Explanation: In the political system of empire, political power was concentrated in the figure of the emperor. The Roman Empire began with Octavian Augustus and ended with Constantine XI. The Senate served to support the emperor's political power.
The empire succeeded the Roman Republic. With the new system, Rome, which was a city state, was ruled by the emperor.
Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
The Second Amendment, one of the ten amendments to the Constitution comprising the Bill of Rights, states: “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” This is the right to bear arms.