1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
3241004551 [841]
4 years ago
11

Write a essay on the cold war

History
1 answer:
damaskus [11]4 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Ok so, The Cold War was a period of tension and hostility between the United States of America and the Soviet Union from the mid-40s to the late 80s. It began with the end of the Second World War. It was called the Cold War because there was no active war between the two nations, which was probably due to the fear of nuclear escalation. There were many indirect conflicts like the Vietnam and Korea wars. There was the Cuban missile crisis in 1962 which was the closest the world ever came to a nuclear war. An American U2 spy plane took photographs of Soviet intermediate ballistic missiles capable of carrying nuclear payloads. The Soviet Union sent a total of 42 medium range missiles and 24 intermediate range missiles to Cuba. The US threatened to invade Cuba over the issue. Ultimately the Soviets removed the missiles on America’s promise of not invading Cuba.

You might be interested in
What four things should you look for when analyzing sources in history?
skad [1K]

When you analyze a primary source, you are undertaking the most important job of the historian. There is no better way to understand events in the past than by examining the sources--whether journals, newspaper articles, letters, court case records, novels, artworks, music or autobiographies--that people from that period left behind.

Each historian, including you, will approach a source with a different set of experiences and skills, and will therefore interpret the document differently. Remember that there is no one right interpretation. However, if you do not do a careful and thorough job, you might arrive at a wrong interpretation.

In order to analyze a primary source you need information about two things: the document itself, and the era from which it comes. You can base your information about the time period on the readings you do in class and on lectures. On your own you need to think about the document itself. The following questions may be helpful to you as you begin to analyze the sources:

1. Look at the physical nature of your source. This is particularly important and powerful if you are dealing with an original source (i.e., an actual old letter, rather than a transcribed and published version of the same letter). What can you learn from the form of the source? (Was it written on fancy paper in elegant handwriting, or on scrap-paper, scribbled in pencil?) What does this tell you?

2. Think about the purpose of the source. What was the author's message or argument? What was he/she trying to get across? Is the message explicit, or are there implicit messages as well?

3. How does the author try to get the message across? What methods does he/she use?

4. What do you know about the author? Race, sex, class, occupation, religion, age, region, political beliefs? Does any of this matter? How?

5. Who constituted the intended audience? Was this source meant for one person's eyes, or for the public? How does that affect the source?

6. What can a careful reading of the text (even if it is an object) tell you? How does the language work? What are the important metaphors or symbols? What can the author's choice of words tell you? What about the silences--what does the author choose NOT to talk about?

Now you can evaluate the source as historical evidence.

1. Is it prescriptive--telling you what people thought should happen--or descriptive--telling you what people thought did happen?

2. Does it describe ideology and/or behavior?

3. Does it tell you about the beliefs/actions of the elite, or of "ordinary" people? From whose perspective?

4. What historical questions can you answer using this source? What are the benefits of using this kind of source?

5. What questions can this source NOT help you answer? What are the limitations of this type of source?

6. If we have read other historians' interpretations of this source or sources like this one, how does your analysis fit with theirs? In your opinion, does this source support or challenge their argument?

Remember, you cannot address each and every one of these questions in your presentation or in your paper, and I wouldn't want you to.



hope it helps

7 0
3 years ago
Both Josiah and Zephaniah were:
NISA [10]

Both Josiah and Zephaniah are descendants of Hezekiah, both are born of royal lineage and they are also fourth-generation descendants Hezekiah (all of the above). Zephaniah is the son of Cushi, and the great-great grandson of King. Josiah, on the other hand, was a seventh-century BCE king of Judah

3 0
3 years ago
A rule for hiring a set number of people from a minority group is____.
kakasveta [241]
C. A quota

In many countries, every company is required by law to hire a set number of minorities to ensure that people of all origins are given equal job opportunity.

Hope this helps!
4 0
3 years ago
When early Spanish explorers reached what is now the southwestern United States, they encountered a number of flourishing agricu
crimeas [40]

Answer:

Native Americans were wiped out by European diseases such as Smallpox which was introduced by the Spanish explorers

Explanation:

In the case described above, the factors that played the biggest role in that change, that is, the French arriving a century later, and then found many of those villages deserted is as a result of "Native Americans were wiped out by European diseases such as Smallpox which was introduced by the Spanish explorers."

This is evident in the fact that the Spanish explorers did similar things to the inhabitants of places like Colombia, Peru, and Chile when they got to Southern America, thereby destroying the health and mortality of the native population.

5 0
3 years ago
Ill give you brainlyist plzz answer asap
Karo-lina-s [1.5K]
Goes down as the temperature decreases, and vice versa. Sound's frequency is independent of temperature, while its speed is directly proportional to temperature. Heat, like sound, is a form of kinetic energy. Molecules at higher temperatures have more energy, thus they can vibrate faster. Since the molecules vibrate faster, sound waves can travel more quickly. ... This is faster than 331 meters per second, which is the speed of sound in air at freezing temperatures.
someone’s answer
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which religion encourages people to be kind to one another?
    7·1 answer
  • What method of change did Mao recommend?
    14·1 answer
  • In general terms, what is hammurabi's code?
    7·1 answer
  • Why is the remedy worse than the disease
    14·1 answer
  • How is popular supreme power of authority used in 2020
    9·2 answers
  • The turning point of the Civil War was the Battle of Gettysburg.<br> True OR<br> False
    7·1 answer
  • The Isle of Youth is near: O Japan O Cuba​
    11·2 answers
  • Who elects the legislature in a presidential system
    7·1 answer
  • What is cooperative system??<br><br>koi hai​
    12·2 answers
  • As a result of US and international involvement in the conflict in Bosnia,
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!