Answer:
The American revolution was inextricably linked with the transformations of the late 18th century, which also took place on the European continent. In time, it almost coincided with the French Revolution, and historically its origin is largely due to the same reasons. Therefore, in the literature these revolutions are often compared. In the question of the origin of the French Revolution, the situational factor is particularly distinguished. The American revolution is interpreted as part of a broad transition period. Both revolutions are interpreted in the context of the theory of clash and change of elites.
First of all, it should be emphasized that the American revolution proceeded under different historical conditions than the French one. While France was a country with a deep historical tradition and centuries-old culture, young America, or rather, the English colonies in America, were relatively recently settled, had not yet had time to acquire traditions and had just begun to create their own culture.
In the American and French revolutions that took place almost at the same time, two essentially opposite concepts prevailed - “checks and balances” and “common will.”.
The American Revolution was a movement based on ideas persistently rethought by the most serious of men in the process of creating a new nation, which was destined to become the freest and most successful community of people in the history of mankind.
The French Revolution was a protest of an angry crowd. It met the desperate resistance of the old classes, and to break it, the merciless dictatorship of the Jacobins was required. The Jacobin dictatorship and the speeches of the plebeian masses were the peak of the revolutionary upsurge in France. The American revolution did not know this kind of phenomenon, and the destruction of the old order did not require such significant efforts.
Explanation:
Citizens are treated unjustly or groups of citizens have limited representation in government.
The New South movement was an effort by southern leaders to integrate the South more fully with the rest of the US and to do away with the old plantation-based economy. It largely failed to gain significant momentum in terms of race relations and economic development by WWI.
Answer
1. It set in a process that led to displacement, removal and relocation of the natives
2. Mining rested on the white American talent for claiming legitimacy
3. Created a rapid urbanization kind of settlement
Explanation
There was a friction between miners and Indians during the rush for Gold mining that resulted into the displacement of the natives. Mining in California rested on the white American talent for claiming legitimacy. This is to say that most of them were newcomers yet it did not prevent them from claiming legitimacy of the place as occupants ignoring natives that had the right to local resources. Mining in the west brought concentrated populations, where the mining patterns of settlements turned out to be the future settlement pattern of the region.
