Answer:
The purchased territory included the whole of today's Arkansas, Iowa, Missouri, Kansas, Oklahoma, and Nebraska, parts of Minnesota and Louisiana west of Mississippi River, including New Orleans, big parts of North and northeastern New Mexico, South Dakota, northern Texas, some parts of Wyoming, Montana, and Colorado
Explanation:
The expedition of Lewis and Clark was such that when they met Native Americans,<u> they were </u><u>happily welcomed</u><u>. </u>
The Lewis and Clark expedition:
- Was meant to explore the Louisiana area
- Encountered mostly peaceful Native Americans
When the expedition ran into most Natives, they traded goods with them and were peaceful. They even let them know that the U.S. owned their land and would protect those who cooperated.
In conclusion, option A is correct.
<em>Find out more about the </em><em><u>Lewis and Clark expedition</u></em><em> at brainly.com/question/894359. </em>
The answer to choose: A) Carter was instrumental in negotiating the Camp David Accords, which directly led to the 1979 Egypt-Israeli Peace Treaty.
Details:
Thanks to the persistent efforts of President Carter in working with Egyptian President Anwar Sadat and Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin, those two leaers signed the Camp David Accords in September, 1978. That led to the 1979 peace treaty between Egypt and Israel that has lasted to the present day. Sadat and Begin were awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 1978 for their efforts in reaching the agreement that they made.
As to the other answers:
The fact that Carter allowed the deposed shah of Iran to come into the USA for medical treatment did provoke the hostage seizure in Tehran. However, that was not a major <u>success</u> of Carter's foreign policy, but a major mistake. (His advisors had tried to tell him in advance that letting the shah come into the US was a bad idea.)
Similarly, the increase of tensions with the Soviet Union over the Olympics would not be an example of a success.
The federal law regarding cleaning up hazardous waste would be a success item, but one of <u>domestic</u> policy, not foreign policy.
<span>Confucius thought all men were basically good, Confucianism believed that family came first, children should honor their parents. If the family was happy, the people would be happy and consequently, the king would find it easy to rule with a gentle hand. Confucianism also believed in a hierarchical society, that everyone had a place and a job. There is very few opportunity to deviate from that order. If you family was a farmer, his son also was a farmer, a soldier's son also a soldier, a statesman's son becames statesman.
Han Fei Tzi was a Legalist. In Legalism people were thought to be bad in nature. They needed laws and regulations with stiff punishments to keep them in line. It was a harsh system, very Macachiavellian in nature. It promoted the better skilled person over less skilled people. It's a dog eat dog society, if you don't eat you'll be eaten. Upward mobility was possible but at a cost of loosing the polite and courteous society which Confucianism provided.
In the end, China used Confucianism to pacify the people but kept the legalistic regulations which govern the country.</span>
Answer:
yes it is permitted to do that
