Answer:
a.Susan is wrong, and Mary is free to disclaim warranties.
Explanation:
According to the Magnuson-Moss Act the seller of a product may or may not provide warranty on a product. But is warranty is provided the following conditions must be met.
- The seller must provide a full or limited warranty.
- The coverage of the warranty must be stated
- Warranty must be available to the customers, so that they can read it before making a purchase.
So Mary can choose to disclaim all warranties on her products, not making her liable for any defects found in them. But if she wants to provide warranty it must be written and follow the conditions stated above.
It is a bad idea because a minimum auto liability insurance policy is meant for compensation against liability and not for saving purpose.
<h3>What is the
liability insurance?</h3>
It is a legal requirement to have an active minimum liability insurance coverage to cover a liability especially injury and damage to third party property
In conclusion, the idea of saving money with the insurance policy is bad because it is meant for compensation against liability and not for saving purpose.
Read more about liability insurance
<em>brainly.com/question/15933666</em>
Answer: Young poultry is best for roasting, broiling, and frying. Older poultry requires braising or stewing methods. Either way, slow, even heat should be used for tender, juicy, evenly done poultry.
<u>Answer: </u>
Benefits are amplified at a point where the minor income efficiency (MRP) is equivalent to the expense of employing a security watch. In this way, a benefit expanding firm will enlist as long as the MRP is more noteworthy than the wages or the expense of recruiting a security monitor.
On the off chance that I need to amplify benefit, at that point I won't enlist the security monitor at a compensation pace of $20 in light of the fact that the expense of recruiting is more noteworthy than the expansion to the complete income or MRP, which is equivalent to $15 (expecting that the security watchman will kill shoplifting).
The above examination shows that a security watchman will be paid a compensation rate for every hour, which is equivalent to the sum spared every hour by the security monitor for wiping out the normal shoplifting every hour.
The sum spared is an expansion to the all out income, and no benefit boosting firm would pay a compensation rate higher than the augmentations to the complete income.
Answer:
He needs to ask his boss for file of work time and clock in and clock out and how much money he made and also benifets and his age and famly memebrs and then go from their.
Explanation:
i may be from diffrent country thern you so might be diffrent
