Well, they can choose as long as they want. But in this case the best answer would life. Does that help?
Answer:
“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness.
Explanation:
Answer:
They're less welcomed
Explanation:
At that time, many traders from western nations (most notably Britain) came to China and sold various type of goods. Opium is one of the most popular product in Chinese market at that time.
This created massive addiction problems which destroy China's economic productivity. The western merchants on the other hand, accumulated large amount of wealth from this trades. As a result, a lot of hostilities toward foreigners started to build up during the Tang Dynasty.
I believe the answer is: the introduction, the body, and the conclusion.
The introduction refers to the efforts that the speaker make to attract the attention of the audiences in the beginning of the speech, the body refers to the actual content of the speech, and the conclusion refers to final/core message that the speaker want to give to the audience.
<span>They will be sentenced more harshly than whites in
"</span>
less serious cases".
The liberation hypothesis contends that the impacts of additional lawful factors, for
example, victim or potentially guilty party race on condemning results are
molded by legitimately significant components, especially the seriousness or
the quality of the case. The theory was first proposed by Harry Kalven and Hans
Zeisel in the book named "The American Jury".
