Many had their homes looted, ransacked, and burned. They lost all their livelihood, wealth, and possessions. Some had to continually relocate their families to keep them safe. All knew the great risk to life and still signed the Declaration.
Answer:
Can you name the greatest mass murderer of the 20th century? No, it wasn’t Hitler or Stalin. It was Mao Zedong.
According to the authoritative “Black Book of Communism,” an estimated 65 million Chinese died as a result of Mao’s repeated, merciless attempts to create a new “socialist” China. Anyone who got in his way was done away with -- by execution, imprisonment or forced famine.
For Mao, the No. 1 enemy was the intellectual. The so-called Great Helmsman reveled in his blood-letting, boasting, “What’s so unusual about Emperor Shih Huang of the China Dynasty? He had buried alive 460 scholars only, but we have buried alive 46,000 scholars.” Mao was referring to a major “accomplishment” of the Great Cultural Revolution, which from 1966-1976 transformed China into a great House of Fear.
Abuse of power or abuse of authority, in the form of "malfeasance in office" or "official misconduct", is the commission of an unlawful act, done in an official capacity, which affects the performance of official duties. Power kills, absolute Power kills absolutely. This new Power Principle is the message emerging from my previous work on the causes of war1 and this book on genocide and government mass murder--what I call democide--in this century. The more power a government has, the more it can act arbitrarily according to the whims and desires of the elite, the more it will make war on others and murder its foreign and domestic subjects. The more constrained the power of governments, the more it is diffused, checked and balanced, the less it will aggress on others and commit democide. At the extremes of Power2, totalitarian communist governments slaughter their people by the tens of millions, while many democracies can barely bring themselves to execute even serial murderers.
Answer:
Answer is D. Social identity is not as useful a predictor of dissonance as psychological variables.
Explanation:
Dissonance can simply be described as a situation or condition whereby the belief of an individual is not in agreement with his/her action.
And , Cognitive dissonance is the participation of an individual in an action that goes against or contradicts his/her values or beliefs.
The cognitive dissonance theory , which was proposed by Leon Festinger in 1957, shows that individual will try to find a way psychologically to resolve the the discomfort experiencing through the contradiction between ones belief and action. And this process has been discovered in making them function very well in the real sense.
