I will be discussing my relationship with a friend and what dialectical tensions we faced altogether. So, when I first met this friend, he was a complete stranger to me and we met in a local market accidentally where our shopping bags got exchanged. We met officially to exchange bags and then got to know each other in a formal discussion. Soon, that bonding developed but there was still uncertainty about this bond
(Predictability/novelty). There was some bizarre tension in my mind to ask him out to meet again but then again it was a kind of some uncomfortable pull that didn't let me do it. When I got to know him better I soon realized that he was too open about his things and experiences and I could not be open the same way about my life(Openness/closeness). Another tension suddenly which we faced was to connect properly and that too how to maintain a bond since we shared quite a bunch of things such as the interest in similar books, TV shows, etc (Autonomy/connectedness).
Learn more about relationships here
brainly.com/question/10286547
#SPJ4
<u>Answer:
</u>
The distributive process by which the burdens and rewards that society has to offer are shared varies from society to society is a TRUE statement.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- Factors like the geography of a region and the tendency of the people formed based on it have to play an important role in how the people in any given region share burdens and rewards amongst themselves.
- Moreover, the varied the demographics of the given region, varied are the patterns of the distribution of burdens and rewards.
If he wants the study to meet scientific standards then the study needs to adhere to the scientific method. The scientific method is made up of several steps.
Step 1: Define the question he wants to ask. So in this it would be something along the lines of, how do people interact with one another.
Step 2: Then do background research into the subject matter.
Step 3: Construct/devise a hypothesis. What does he expect the outcome of the study to be.
Step 4: Test his hypothesis by carrying out the experiment. Make it clear what kind of experiment he intends on using for example an observation.
Step 5: Analyze the data gathered from the experiment.
Step 6. Draw a conclusion from the results.
Step 7: Share the results through writing a report/article.
I believe the answer is: counter conditioning
counter conditioning refers to the process of changing unwanted behaviour to a wanted behaviour by utilizing positive reinforcement.
In the scenario above, being scared of furry things is the unwanted behaviour, not being scared of furry things is the wanted behaviours, and the favourite snack is the positive environment.
On average, this effect started to appear if someone's BAC level has reach 0.15 %.
On average, 2 standard drinks could cause an increase in 0.05 % of BAC (depending on each person's body mechanism)
So, it took about 5 drinks for Jane to get into that level of effect.
