Answer:
- <u>Members of teams with high cohesiveness feel higher loyalty to the team and have better job satisfaction.</u>
- <u>Teams with high cohesiveness are generally more productive due to the energizing effect of regular interaction among team members.</u>
Explanation:
Remember, cohesiveness looks at the degree to which team members <em>stick</em> together in times of difficulties.
Also cohesive teams are good communicators; they would involve in regular interactions among team members, an attitude which when applied to an organisation setting would increase the team's productivity.
Answer:
in this scenario, susan and sam has not done any wrong things.
but Martin has manipulated sam to take revenge from susan for firing him.
so in this case, no susan is not obliged to pay. she can take action against martin and after proving in a court of law about martin's manipulation, he will be liable to pay.
Explanation:
Answer:
B
Explanation:
the company is achieving its financial and strategic objectives and whether it is an above-average industry performer.
The answer is "<span>Google Recaptcha".
</span>
CAPTCHA stands for Completely Automated Public Turing test to tell Computers and Humans Apart and Google's reCAPTCHA is the main CAPTCHA service on the Web. You've likely observed CAPTCHAs a million times on join pages over the Web; to isolate people from spam bots, a test will fly up soliciting you to unravel a photo from words or numbers, choose questions in a lattice of pictures, or simply click a checkbox. Presently, however, you will see CAPTCHAs less and less, not on account of Google is disposing of them but rather in light of the fact that Google is making them undetectable.
Answer:
The correct answer is Dell will offer $20 per copy of the software and Symantec will accept the offer.
Explanation:
A Nash equilibrium is a situation in which all players have put into practice, and know that they have done so, a strategy that maximizes their earnings given the strategies of others. Consequently, no player has any incentive to individually modify their strategy.
It is important to keep in mind that a Nash equilibrium does not imply that the best joint result for the participants is achieved, but only the best result for each of them considered individually. It is perfectly possible that the result would be better for everyone if, in some way, the players coordinated their action.
In economic terms, it is a kind of imperfect balance of competition that describes the situation of several companies competing for the market of the same good and who can choose how much to produce to try to maximize their profit.
