Answer:
C) tender.
Explanation:
In contract law, a tender offer to perform is conditioned to the moment when the other party is willing and ready to perform as well. In this case, CrossCountry signed a contract, but the contract will be valid when the other party (Discount Outlet Stores) needs their services. If the other party does not require their services, CrossCountry is not able to perform nor demand performance.
Answer:
The Current share price is $94.79
Explanation:
Dividend Growth Model determines the share price of a company which offers perpetual dividend with stable growth. It is the expected dividend of a share divided by the net return rate of growth rate
.
According to given data
Last dividend = D0 = $3.40
Rate of return = 15%
Growth rates:
For 3 years = 29% per year
After 3 years = 7.3% in perpetuity
Dividend after 3 years = D3 = 3.40 x ( 1 + 0.29 )^3 = $7.30
We can calculate the price of share using following formula:
Price of share = D3 / Rate of return - Growth rate
Price of share = $7.30 / 15% - 7.3% = $7.30 / 7.70% = $94.79
<u>Answer:</u>
<em>$50,325 is the sale price of the property</em>
<u>Explanation:</u>
Karen made a commission of $3522.75 on the sale of a property. Splitter commission clear with her broker which is 50% to the broker and 50% Karen. Broker took 55% of the total commission on a 7% commission rate.
So not considering the commission for a while if we divide commission by the commission rate we will get the sale price.
$3522.75/0.07= $50,325.
Saying that money is indivisible is false. As long as its not a penny, money can be divided down to the last cent
Answer:
The Home owner commenced the action in a state A court ( C )
Explanation:
The Defendant ( the contractor) can decide to transfer the case from a state court to a federal court within the same state in which the case was filled by the The home owner if the federal court has the Jurisdiction to rule on the case
Since the contract was signed in state A under the laws of the state the case is definitely a state case and the Homeowner's move to remand the case to a state court with the argument that the Federal court lacks proper Jurisdiction is in order. The court decision on the matter will be based on the fact that the Homeowner commenced the action in a state A court where the contract was signed.