1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
bonufazy [111]
3 years ago
5

Would someone help me with this problem

Mathematics
1 answer:
ruslelena [56]3 years ago
3 0

hey buddy how's it going?

You might be interested in
If you flip a coin ten times, how many diffrent sequences of heads and tails are possible
nikdorinn [45]

Answer:

I'm pretty sure its D

Step-by-step explanation: Brainliest???

3 0
4 years ago
Find the unknown size <br>please I really need answers ​
katen-ka-za [31]

Answer:

z=80°<em><u>(</u></em><em><u>corresponding</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>angles)</u></em>

<em><u>x+z=180°(linear \: pair \: ) \\ 80°  + x = 180°  \\ x= 100°</u></em>

<em><u>y=</u></em><em><u>100 </u></em><em><u>° </u></em><em><u>(</u></em><em><u>alternate</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>angles</u></em><em><u>)</u></em>

<h2><em><u>Hope </u></em><em><u>it </u></em><em><u>helps</u></em><em><u> you</u></em><em><u><</u></em><em><u>3</u></em></h2>
8 0
2 years ago
PQ = 3x + 14 and QR = 7x - 10; Find x.
Bezzdna [24]
Can you repost this with the picture
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Drag and drop the answer into the box to identify each function as linear, exponential, or neither.
katrin2010 [14]
<span>​x​ 2 3 4
f(x) 5.5 7 8.5 </span>

The first function is linear. When you subtract 5.5 from 7, you get 1.5 and when you subtract 7 from 8.5 you also get 1.5. That's how we know it's a linear function because there's clearly pattern. HOWEVER, if you had 5.5, 7, and 9 that would not be a linear function. Why? Because when you take away 7 from 9 you get 2. In order for it to be a linear function you have to get the same exact number when you subtract. 

<span>x​ 0 3 6
f(x) 1 8 64</span> 

The second function is exponential because when you divide you get the exact same number. 8/1 = 8 and 64/8 = 8. So this is exponential. But if you had 72 instead of 64 it would not be an exponential function because there has to be a pattern. 

I hope this makes sense. Btw I had this question on my test too and this is correct. 
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Please help me with this
Rudik [331]

Answer:

  x = 18

Step-by-step explanation:

The parts of the triangles are proportional, so you can write ...

  2x/80 = 27/60

Multiply by 120:

  3x = 54

Divide by 3:

  x = 18

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • 48 is how many percent of 70
    11·1 answer
  • 1. Consider the sequence
    12·1 answer
  • Help me I don’t understand
    14·2 answers
  • URGENT! WILL MARK BRAIN!
    14·2 answers
  • In winter, the price of apples suddenly went up by $0.75 per pound. Sam bought 3 pounds of apples at the new price for a total o
    9·1 answer
  • Emil is purchasing a $175,000 home with a 15-year mortgage. He will make a
    5·1 answer
  • Do I multiply 60% of 68
    9·2 answers
  • This trapezoid is made up of two right triangles and one rectangle.
    7·1 answer
  • Parents will kill me if I don't get this done in an hour (BRAINLIEST IF ANSWER IS CORRECT AND WORK IS SHOWN)
    10·1 answer
  • I need help with this <br> I need love
    5·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!