According to Zygmunt BaumanIt we live in a liquid world, that is we are overwhelmed by information, relationships are not mostly meant to last, things change at a pace never seen before by humans, having said this, our literary culture is bombarded by mass produced literature, for instance the <em>Twilight</em> saga and the <em>Harry Porter</em> saga which by themselvesis not bad but it seems that people compete to say how many book they have read, but the question is how many books have they really read? Although I wouldn't change much of the writying style, I don't think there is a general school of writing nowadays so anyone can be romantic, barroque, neoclassic, moden, what suits them, but the approach to reading for details and cross reference to traditional and classic must be preserved. There is no denial that more people read now but they need to be taught how to read critically and challenge the classic tropes, but not by enacting newer tropes, for instance I am yet to see a prodigalson story emphasising and redeeming the older brother.
The government cannot have a say on cultural matters, the max they can do is help promote new artists.
It certainly differs to the mass production approach of publishers, as everyboidey else they need money so it is understandable that they encourage this liquid approach to reading, the faster you read, the more books you will buy, so although we have analysed the phenomenom it is difficult to pass a final judgement on how things ought to be.
Climb the ladder to change the bulb
Answer:
Topic: The decision to censor particular books is often tied to current political or social debates.
1. People are social media addicts. The internet is usually either plainly seen as republican or democratic views and they are expressed to you in a manner that you could actually believe what they are writing about. They attempt to reach into your own morals and values and convince you that you need to read a certain book - or that a book has things in it that would not be appropriate for you and your beliefs.
Hopefully, the students have a teacher, as myself, that will encourage them to read all the banned books that they can get their hands on. Even though most of all literature is somewhere on the web, I encourage you to purchase the banned books. Politically motivated censorship is usually someone trying to please the people. Give them what they want; in reality we do not want books to be banned. It is simple really, if you do not want to read it, then do not read it. Whatever is going on in the news, is usually somewhere in history and written about already. History repeats itself and it is evident that there are people that want to control what you think and what you say. They want to control people. There is no government for the people by the people any longer, if they continue to ban books. If we allow them to continue to ban books, this will trickle slowly into other areas of our lives. They start slow, and then they get into the media to try to sway people to believe a certain way.
Explanation:
Books - the ones you still can hold in your hand and read - will continue to disappear. People will try to control what you think, eat, believe and attempt to change your value system and your morals.
Fake news? possibly, but in reality, no on should ban books.
If you have not READ (not watched) Fahrenheit 451, I encourage you to do so. Read the book. If you choose to watch the movie, wait until you have read the book.
Answer:
My answer is not concrete however, I believe it is A.
Sorry if this is not correct!