Hello!
The correct answer is C. "People who support animal testing are crazy."
This is an example of an ad hominem fallacy because the thesis states that animal testing is valuable, which insinuates that the person making the claim believes in animal testing. By claiming that "people who support animal testing are crazy" is making a statement about the person himself rather than about the argument. The sentence is stating that the person who supports animal testing is crazy rather than explaining a counter-argument about the topic.
I hope this helps you! Have a lovely day!
- Mal
It’s false , a topic sentence can appear in any sentence as long as it’s in the introduction. Hope this helps
In areas like political or social debates, a disputant is the person who takes part in a dispute. In words put simply, a disputant is a debater. He/she states her arguments on significant world problems or issues based on his/her experience, research and moral principles. When there is a conflict resolution, it means that there is an agreement reached by the two disputants or debaters.
<span>By showing how Carolyn’s family lives in a way that is similar to him, Soto supports the idea that there are very few differences among cultures.
I believe this is correct, because there are many descriptive words in the passage. If Soto would have left these words out the reader would not know where the story takes place.
</span>
