Puritans did not agree with the Anglican church so the wanted to change it. They could do that in Massachusetts. Church leaders led the local government and everyone in the colony had to pay to support the Puritan church. - www.manythings.org.
Answer:
The correct answer choice for the question: Which of the following phrases best characterizes Herbert Hoover´s foreign policy agenda, would be: the last one: Mutual respect, in terms of being available to support others when called upon, but not interfering unnecessarily in their affairs.
Explanation:
Herbert Hoover served as the 31st president of the United States from 1929 to 1933, and he faced one of the toughest economical debacles in all of history. Although highly criticized later for the inefficient ways in which he was perceived to have acted to stop the domino effects of the Great Depression, there is one thing that can be said about him; he definitely believed in non-interventionism, whether on internal affairs, or foreign affairs. In foreign relations, Hoover was responsible for stepping down from intervening anymore in Latin American affairs, and also, as events that led to World War II, on events that took place in Asia. However, he was also always ready to act if needed; thus, he was not above threatening to intervene militarily in the Dominican Republic, and other such places. This is why the last option is the best one to describe this character´s international agenda.
The greatest difference between the 14 points and the ToV is the blame for the war. In the ToV Germany is blamed for the war and the Treaty is more a sentence than terms of an armistice, to where the 14 points was more a negotiated settlement for an armistice. The 14 points may have included and recognized the new German and would have brought that government into the negotiation process. Many aspects would have been difficult for Germany to agree to but instead of the agreement being forced upon them the new German government would have played a role in the resolution. It was the Germans that first accepted the 14 points for an armistice, knew the terms, and exiled there emperor I believe that there would have been strong support to honor the agreement by the German people. The ToV on the other hand was made to punish the Germans, Breakup the German Empire, and have the Germans pay for the war. It was also made to negate the role played by Wilson and the USA in the war. The ToV also allowed the Allied powers to keep their colonies and only the German colonies were, in some point in time, to be open for autonomous rule. The 14 points might have prevented WW2, the ToV was the punishment that bound the German people together to avenge the disgrace.
I hope I helped!
Joseph Stalin was a brutal and sometime merciless leader who had powerful, unmoving visions for the USSR. Men were in high demand for industrial jobs during this time.
The Opium Wars were two minor wars fought between China and Great Britain (primarily) over the opium trade in China. They took place during the middle of the 1800s near the end of the Qing Dynasty. Some historians consider the Opium Wars to be the start of the modern era in China.
After winning the war, the British forced the Chinese to sign the Treaty of Ranking. The treaty reestablished trade between the countries and opened up five trade ports to Britain. It also forced China to pay $21 million in reparations and gave Britain control of the city of Hong Kong
At the Convention of Peking in 1860, the Chinese agreed to sign a treaty with Britain and France. The treaty legalized the opium trade, established freedom of religion in China, forced China to pay France and Britain reparations, and opened a new trade port.
<h2>
so technically its A</h2><h2>
an opium addiction occurred in China</h2><h2>
because the Opium got very addictive</h2>
