1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
o-na [289]
3 years ago
14

Which evidence from the passage best supports the inference that Nikola Tesla was very

History
2 answers:
timofeeve [1]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

<em>Tesla even boasted of his early forays into inventing, 'I needed no models,  drawings, or experiments. I could picture them all as real in my mind.</em>

Explanation:

The statement <em>Tesla even boasted of his early forays into inventing, 'I needed no models,  drawings, or experiments. I could picture them all as real in my mind.' </em>best illustrates the power of Tesla's imagination. His mind was all that he needed in the process of invention. That is the only statement out of all listed that is not directly about his experiments and inventions, which are all a result of his creativity.

Nat2105 [25]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

the answer is <u>"Tesla even boasted of his early forays into inventing, 'I needed no models,  drawings, or experiments. I could picture them all as real in my mind."</u>

Explanation:

You might be interested in
I SWEAR IF YOU CAN HELP I WILL GIVE YOU BRANLIEST 20 One viewpoint was suggested by _______________ and was called the _________
VladimirAG [237]

Answer: breanna here

July 16, 1987, began with a light breeze, a cloudless sky, and a spirit of celebration. On that day, 200 senators and representatives boarded a special train for a journey to Philadelphia to celebrate a singular congressional anniversary.

Exactly 200 years earlier, the framers of the U.S. Constitution, meeting at Independence Hall, had reached a supremely important agreement. Their so-called Great Compromise (or Connecticut Compromise in honor of its architects, Connecticut delegates Roger Sherman and Oliver Ellsworth) provided a dual system of congressional representation. In the House of Representatives each state would be assigned a number of seats in proportion to its population. In the Senate, all states would have the same number of seats. Today, we take this arrangement for granted; in the wilting-hot summer of 1787, it was a new idea.

In the weeks before July 16, 1787, the framers had made several important decisions about the Senate’s structure. They turned aside a proposal to have the House of Representatives elect senators from lists submitted by the individual state legislatures and agreed that those legislatures should elect their own senators.

By July 16, the convention had already set the minimum age for senators at 30 and the term length at six years, as opposed to 25 for House members, with two-year terms. James Madison explained that these distinctions, based on “the nature of the senatorial trust, which requires greater extent of information and stability of character,” would allow the Senate “to proceed with more coolness, with more system, and with more wisdom than the popular[ly elected] branch.”

The issue of representation, however, threatened to destroy the seven-week-old convention. Delegates from the large states believed that because their states contributed proportionally more to the nation’s financial and defensive resources, they should enjoy proportionally greater representation in the Senate as well as in the House. Small-state delegates demanded, with comparable intensity, that all states be equally represented in both houses. When Sherman proposed the compromise, Benjamin Franklin agreed that each state should have an equal vote in the Senate in all matters—except those involving money.

Over the Fourth of July holiday, delegates worked out a compromise plan that sidetracked Franklin’s proposal. On July 16, the convention adopted the Great Compromise by a heart-stopping margin of one vote. As the 1987 celebrants duly noted, without that vote, there would likely have been no Constitution.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
I need help. This is due tomorrow
Ludmilka [50]
1.warts and all
I'm still trying to figure out number two
5 0
2 years ago
How did Burnside's aggressive moves lead to failure?
sweet-ann [11.9K]

Answer:

burnside was removed and replaced by Mcclellan

Explanation:

have the same question

3 0
3 years ago
I WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST
dlinn [17]

Answer:

D

Explanation:

Peninsulares because they were Spanish-American they were at the top of the social class at the time. They ruled the high office, land and commonly wealth.

6 0
3 years ago
Who was the first to create a form of calendar?
lys-0071 [83]

Explanation:

He's Gregorian calendar.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Progressive city governments set up zoning laws to
    7·1 answer
  • Which of the motives for american imperialism do you think was the most important? why?
    12·1 answer
  • How did Japanese and European rules Consolidate their powers?
    7·1 answer
  • Which of the following is NOT a reason to use an exclamation mark (!) ? Boredom Humor Excitement Sharp Instruction
    14·1 answer
  • Article Il of the Constitution defines the roles of
    11·1 answer
  • In the latter stages of the civil war who was given the responsibility of winning the war for the north
    11·1 answer
  • Constantinople's trade with Russia resulted in Byzantine influence in the areas of religion and
    7·1 answer
  • How did the Cold War affect the rest of the world?
    7·1 answer
  • Which region of the country needed the most rebuilding after the war?.
    13·1 answer
  • I was soon put down under the decks, and there I received such a salutation [greeting] in my nostrils as I had never experienced
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!