Well, smartphone applications are developed by 1. manufacturers of the handheld device, 2. <span>third-party software developers and finally by </span><span>operators of the communications network on which they operate. </span>
Answer:
a)
These controlling processes are inappropriate or not enough as the administration accompanying the fraud might supersede the complete control method to bypass the particular pair.
b)
In traditional state of affairs, management might obligate fraud to setting higher revenue and thus attaining high value.
An administration fraud can't be known simply by an ordinary man because it includes distinctive appreciative of financials. Thus one will use the assistance of consultants for investigative having an uncertainty thereon. So the audit group might be effective in preventing this kind of deception as they're predictable to operate as a regulator against administration fraud by observation money news declarations and control processes of a company. A perfect audit group would include the external or internal auditors which might assure for the credibility of the knowledge bestowed to the group.
Answer:
When a company sells different securities together (this usually happens during mergers and acquisitions):
- and the price of all the securities is not certain, the incremental method will first allocate proceeds to the sale of securities whose price is actually certain. The remaining proceeds will be allocated to the securities whose price is uncertain. E.g. total sales $10 million, stocks worth $5 million were sold and bonds worth ? million were sold. The company will allocate $5 million to stocks and $5 million to bonds.
- and the price of all the securities is certain, the proportional method allocates the sales proceeds proportionally among the different securities sold. E.g. total sales $10 million, stocks worth $5 million were sold and bonds worth $3 million were sold. The company will allocate ($5/$8) x $10 million = $6.25 million to stocks and $3.75 to bonds.
Is this a multiple choice question? Is there a word bank? If not, I'm not quite sure.
Answer:
COGS= $58,000
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
The year began with an inventory of $20,000, Purchases for the year were $45,000, and the Ending Inventory was $7,000.
To calculate the cost of goods sold, we need to use the following formula:
COGS= beginning finished inventory + cost of goods purchased - ending finished inventory
COGS= 20,000 + 45,000 - 7,000
COGS= $58,000