1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Katena32 [7]
3 years ago
14

What are some possible consequences of the rapid settlement of Oregon?

History
1 answer:
nikdorinn [45]3 years ago
5 0

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

If the question refers to the Westward Expansion from 1807 to 1912, that made thousands of pioneers to cross the Oregon Trail, then some possible consequences of the rapid settlement of Oregon would be the occupation of lands to be used as farms and get people new opportunities to make a decent living growing crops. The rapid settlement was notorious by 1840. Oregon lands "promised" fertile soil. That is why people from the Mississippi Valley decide to move to Oregon. Mane Eastern farmers decided to better move to Oregon instead than New Mexico or California, thinking that the land in Oregon was more fertile to farmland. People had to cross the above mentioned Oregon Trail, knowing that the trip would not be easy.

You might be interested in
How did historical fact replace the fanciful notions of Rome and its ancient society?Select one:a. the discovery and excavations
ycow [4]

Answer:

A) the discovery and excavations of Herculaneum and Pompeii

Explanation:

Different from a book or a drawing which can show us just a part of the building or city, and we must use our imagination to think and feel how it was the real construction, the excavations of Herculaneum and Pompeii provide us the factual prove, the real structure that was described in books and scriptures, and based on the theoretical ideas, we can make a comparison and found out the truth.

8 0
4 years ago
How did the beating of senator sumner pull the nation apart
Natasha_Volkova [10]

Answer: On May 22, 1856, the "world's greatest deliberative body" became a combat zone. In one of the most dramatic and deeply ominous moments in the Senate's entire history, a member of the House of Representatives entered the Senate Chamber and savagely beat a senator into unconsciousness. The inspiration for this clash came three days earlier when Senator Charles Sumner, a Massachusetts antislavery Republican, addressed the Senate on the explosive issue of whether Kansas should be admitted to the Union as a slave state or a free state. In his "Crime Against Kansas" speech, Sumner identified two Democratic senators as the principal culprits in this crime—Stephen Douglas of Illinois and Andrew Butler of South Carolina. He characterized Douglas to his face as a "noise-some, squat, and nameless animal . . . not a proper model for an American senator."  Andrew Butler, who was not present, received more elaborate treatment. Mocking the South Carolina senator's stance as a man of chivalry, the Massachusetts senator charged him with taking "a mistress . . . who, though ugly to others, is always lovely to him; though polluted in the sight of the world, is chaste in his sight—I mean," added Sumner, "the harlot, Slavery." Representative Preston Brooks was Butler's South Carolina kinsman. If he had believed Sumner to be a gentleman, he might have challenged him to a duel. Instead, he chose a light cane of the type used to discipline unruly dogs. Shortly after the Senate had adjourned for the day, Brooks entered the old chamber, where he found Sumner busily attaching his postal frank to copies of his "Crime Against Kansas" speech. Moving quickly, Brooks slammed his metal-topped cane onto the unsuspecting Sumner's head. As Brooks struck again and again, Sumner rose and lurched blindly about the chamber, futilely attempting to protect himself. After a very long minute, it ended. Bleeding profusely, Sumner was carried away.  Brooks walked calmly out of the chamber without being detained by the stunned onlookers. Overnight, both men became heroes in their respective regions. Surviving a House censure resolution, Brooks resigned, was immediately reelected, and soon thereafter died at age 37. Sumner recovered slowly and returned to the Senate, where he remained for another 18 years. The nation, suffering from the breakdown of reasoned discourse that this event symbolized, tumbled onward toward the catastrophe of civil war.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Who if the first president
lions [1.4K]

Answer:

Explanation:I'm not able to understand your question.

5 0
3 years ago
The Catholic Church has its own reformation in the 1500s called the
pishuonlain [190]

Answer:

protestant reformation

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The European system of manorialism is most
fenix001 [56]
D would be the answer
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was the 13th admendment? Was was passing it so important to president Lincoln?
    6·1 answer
  • A woman who shows no symptoms of having gonorrhea can take comfort in knowing that she does not have the disease and will not ex
    12·1 answer
  • How did the Chinese try to limit European trade and involvement in the mid-1760s?
    15·2 answers
  • Under capitalism which industry does not need to compete?
    14·1 answer
  • How does society affect agriculture
    7·1 answer
  • 5. Why were IDF planes so
    15·1 answer
  • What advantages did the constitution provide to the small states?
    12·1 answer
  • The end of the Roman Republic and the beginning of the Roman Empire is thought to have occurred in about 44 B.C. after the death
    12·2 answers
  • Describe the largest ghetto
    11·1 answer
  • Unit 5 Exam
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!