Answer:
लेख्नुहोस। नयाँ ब्यब्साय विभिन्न विधि हरु ब्य्ख्य गर्नुहोस
Explanation:
Answer:
B. The denial is justifiable given the level of interbrand competition.
Explanation:
Anti trust law only applicable if you can proof that two or more producers in the same industry work together in order to assert their control over the market. They can do this through price fixing, controlling the amount of supply, etc.
This condition<em> can't be found</em> in the scenario above.
The denial that done by PepsiCo is justifiable because in a really competitive market, a company need to impose a strict requirement on which entities they should form a dealership relation with. If PepsiCo choose the wrong dealers, Its competitors could easily taken over the market and resulted in a huge amount of loss for the company.
Answer:
The correct option is B
Explanation:
FDI is an investment in the business through an investor from another country and control is with the foreign investor over the company purchased.
Licensing means all the contracts to which the third part has granted or licensed any right to its subsidiaries or company.
So, the reason for preferring FDI instead of license is sharing the intellectual know how with the foreign rival might be risky as this is a limitation in licensing.
Usually D.) Focus Group
They are a small group of people who will review and give feedback on a test product. The other alternative (B, sample audience) is for when the product is usually already in its earl development stage. (Not a prototype)
Answer:
Change in US external wealth between periods T and T +1 in dollars = -$100
Explanation:
Since nothing else changes, this implies that the exchange rate per yen is $0.01 in periods T and T +1. Therefore, we have:
Value shares of Sonic in period T in dollar = Number of shares of Sonic bought in period T * Price per share of Sonic in Yen in period T * Exchange rate per yen in periods T = 100 * 700 * $0.01 = $700
Value shares of Sonic in period T+1 in dollar = Number of shares of Sonic in period T+1 * Price per share of Sonic in Yen in period T+1 * Exchange rate per yen in period T+1 = 100 * 600 * $0.01 = $600
Change in US external wealth between periods T and T +1 in dollars = Value shares of Sonic in period T+1 in dollar - Value shares of Sonic in period T in dollar = $600 - $700 = -$100
