Answer:
b. might be liable for negligent hiring.
Explanation:
In this case, the camp could potentially be liable for negligent hiring. Negligent hiring refers to a legal claim that is made against an employer. In this case, it is argued that the employer knew, or should have known, about an employee's personal history before hiring them. These claims often arise in situations in which the hiring manager or team did not carefully investigate the person's background before hiring him or her.
Answer:
During their time in ‘Secret Annex’, the Franks and the van Daans had very limited contact with the outside world. Their only means were the hidden radio in the private office and their Dutch friends who brought news of the outside world. Broadcasts from England could be heard on the radio and the Franks and the-van Daans heard the radio every evening after 7.30 pm, when the office was closed for the day
i know this is late but i hope it helps:
The purpose of politics is to make a country remain balanced and to achieve goals that cannot be achieved personally. Politics is a very important and hard job to do. If you do a decision you not only have to think about yourself but the whole country, state or city. But politics today are rigid and the political leaders care more about money and the fame than there country of course I can’t say there aren’t any exceptions but most of the leaders today let the money pass over there head and forget about the people they are serving. I personally think that democracy is stupid but I normally ignore politics and look into news that are interest me more than politics. But everybody has their opinion and this is mine
Human rights in Myanmar under its military regime have long been regarded as among the worst in the world.[1][2] International human rights organisations including Human Rights Watch,[3] Amnesty International,[4] and the American Association for the Advancement of Science[5] have repeatedly documented and condemned widespread human rights violations in Burma. The Freedom in the World 2011 report by Freedom House notes that "The military junta has... suppressed nearly all basic rights; and committed human rights abuses with impunity." In 2011 the "country's more than 2,100 political prisoners included about 429 members of the NLD, the victors in the 1990 elections."[6] As of July 2013, according to the Assistance Association for Political Prisoners, there were about 100 political prisoners in Burmese prisons.[7][8][9][10]
Answer:
Congressional districts must have roughly equal populations if this is feasible.
In an opinion authored by Hugo L. Black, the 6-3 majority held that the district court had jurisdiction because debasement of the right to vote as a result of a state congressional apportionment law was justiciable and not subject to dismissal for "want of equity." The Court further held that the apportionment statute was invalid because it abridged the requirement of Article 1, section 2 of the Constitution that The House of Representatives shall be composed of members chosen every second year by the people of the several states, and the electors in each state shall have the qualifications requisite for electors of the most numerous branch of the state legislature.
Justice Clark concurred in part and dissented in part. He agreed with the majority that the trial court erred in dismissing the case for nonjusticiability and want of equity, but stated further that Article 1, section 2, does not forbid disproportionate congressional districts and that the case should be remanded for a hearing to determine whether the apportionment statute violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Justice Harlan dissented on the ground that the Constitution expressly provides that state legislatures and Congress have exclusive jurisdiction over problems of congressional apportionment of the type involved in the case.
Justice Stewart stated that he joined with Mr. Justice Harlan's dissent except insofar as there might be implied in that dissent the view that the issues were not justiciable.
Explanation: