The answer is B/2
hope this helps
It is very emotional and inspiring
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Compare and Contrast the words of the song to the views of U.S. Government officials of the late 1800s and early 1900s and with the text of the Dawes Act.
Ok, first we have to say the m¿name of the song that is going to be compared. It is "Don't Drink that Water," performed by David Mattews Band.
Part of the lyrics says the following<em>."What were you expecting? Not room for both. Jus room for me....Yes, I will call this home...You have been banished..."</em>
This song can be compared to the Dawes Act in that this act broke up the Native tribes to support the "Americanization" of the Native Indians and the settling of the white Americans in their territories.
It was Massachusetts legislator Henry Dawes who supported the Dawes Act in 1887, a piece of legislation known as the General Allotment Act.
It was August 7, 1964 when the Gulf of Tunkin
Resolution passed by the US Congress right after the alleged attack on two US
naval destroyers stationed off the coast of Vietnam. The Gulf of Tonkin
Resolution viably propelled America's full-scale inclusion in the Vietnam War.
Though there is no formal declaration of war, this also gave President Johnson
approval "to take all necessary steps, including the use of armed force,
to assist any member or protocol state of the Southeast Asia Collective Defense
Treaty requesting assistance in defense of its freedom." This has been
used by Johnson and Pres. Richard Nixon as a justification for escalated
involvement in Indochina.
Italians for all smuggling, guntrade, alcohol trade, rackets etc
Asians 'cause of the conflict with Japan in World War 2 eg: Pearl Harbour, Hiroshima/Nagasaki nukes.
Spanish. America have always hated the spanish.
Russians due to the clash of left/right wing politics.
