True. Yes because every religious boy in Christianity has it own explanation to account of the God and different ideology.
<span />
During the February Revolution, Czar Nicholas II, ruler of Russia
since 1894, is forced to abdicate the throne by the Petrograd
insurgents, and a provincial government is installed in his place.
Crowned
on May 26, 1894, Nicholas was neither trained nor inclined to rule,
which did not help the autocracy he sought to preserve in an era
desperate for change. The disastrous outcome of the Russo-Japanese War
led to the Russian Revolution
of 1905, which the czar diffused only after signing a manifesto
promising representative government and basic civil liberties in Russia.
However, Nicholas soon retracted most of these concessions, and the
Bolsheviks and other revolutionary groups won wide support. In 1914,
Nicholas led his country into another costly war, and discontent in
Russia grew as food became scarce, soldiers became war-weary, and
devastating defeats on the eastern front demonstrated the czar’s
ineffectual leadership.
In March 1917, the army garrison at
Petrograd joined striking workers in demanding socialist reforms, and
Czar Nicholas II was forced to abdicate. Nicholas and his family were
first held at the Czarskoye Selo palace, then in the Yekaterinburg
palace near Tobolsk. In July 1918, the advance of counterrevolutionary
forces caused the Yekaterinburg Soviet forces to fear that Nicholas
might be rescued. After a secret meeting, a death sentence was passed on
the imperial family, and Nicholas, his wife, his children, and several
of their servants were gunned down on the night of July 16.
Answer:
i guess you learn something new everyday
Explanation:
Answer:
Explanation:
Small personal items they uncovered included a copper lacing aglet, lead fishing line weight, spike fragments, a wrought iron nail and five Indian trade beads from Venice. The artifacts left no doubt in their minds that Garner found where Luna and about 1,500 other people settled in 1559 in Pensacola.
1. Because wonder woman is perceived as a strong and heroic figure, which is very rare depiction on female characters.
Most of other female characters that we see in either fictional or historical books would depict a weak and feminine individuals that invited other people to protect them
2. I believe the answer would be no.
I'm not saying that the quote is not based on valid argument. But the myth is aimed to tackle the public perception that most women are women, lack of force, and non heroic.
The quote on the other hand only act as a response to coping mechanism from the pre-existing perception.
3. Because female on average are much more caring in term of facing social issues compared to male on average.
This would most likely create a society where all the poor are taken care of and all the social issues that exist within the society would be addressed properly.
4. I think it's because of the counter reaction of actual Athenian history that dominated by Men.
In real athenian society, women would have no role beside taking care of children and household, and the Amzonian story reflect the wasted potential of women in such society.
