There is an important difference between a significant result and a meaningful result. The statement is True.
<h3>What is the Result?</h3>
A result is generally referred to as the outcome or end conclusion of any process that takes place, which tells about what is the final output and its uses which help in making decisions.
Meaningfulness measures how much the variations and connections presented in a study are useful to practice or any activity whereas statistical significance measures how much of the conclusion was influenced by coincidence.
Therefore, the statement is True.
Learn more about the result, here:
brainly.com/question/26687738
#SPJ4
Indian art has influenced different cultures to try to be like their culture
Answer:
a. mild.
Explanation:
Intellectual disability: In psychology, the term intellectual disability is described as one of the disabilities which is distinguished as having a few specific limitations in adaptive behaviors as well as intellectual functioning that tend to cover or encompass an individual's day-to-day practical and social skills. Intellectual disability is being discovered before eighteen years of age of an individual's life.
Mild intellectual disability: If an individual's IQ level is below 70-75, then he or she would be considered as intellectually disabled. A person with a mild intellectual disability is considered slower than the average person to learn or grasp new skills or information.
In the question above, Emily is described as having a mild intellectual disability.
Answer:
(a) P(A and B)
(b) P(B | A)
(c) P(Ac | B)
(d) P(A or B)
(e) P(Bc or A)
Explanation:
The letter P that represents the probability is set out of the brackets so inside of them we can find the words that define the interaction of the elements that present the hypothesis, the sentences present variants of the symbols P(A | B) that is the general form to represent statistics, which is the conditional probability function and means the probability of event A given event B occurred.
Answer:
Based on the reconstructed temperatures, precipitation changes, and occurrences of extreme climate events, together with historical records on fiscal deterioration, food crises, and the frequencies of popular unrest, rebellions and wars, we identified three principal ways in which climate change contributed to the collapse in the Ming dynasty. Firstly, cooling, aridification, and desertification during a cold period destroyed the military farm system, which was the main supply system for the provisioning of government troops on the northern frontiers; these impacts increased the military expenditure from 64 % of total government expenditure in 1548–1569 to 76 % in 1570–1589 and thus aggravated the national fiscal crisis that occurred during the late Ming dynasty. Secondly, climate deterioration (e.g., cooling, aridification, and an increase in the frequencies of frost- and drought-related disasters, etc.) led to a 20–50 % reduction in the per capita production of raw grain in most areas of China, which resulted in widespread food crises and exacerbated the vulnerability of social structures during the last several decades of the Ming dynasty
Explanation:
