Answer:
2.1 liter.
Explanation:
Homeostasis may be defined as the phenomena of the maintenance of the internal environment of the body irrespective of the change in the external or internal environment.
The water consumption is important for the body as the human's body consists of more than 60% water.
The water consumption can be calculated as follows:
Water consumption = water loss - water produced.
Water loss from exercise = 2000 ml = 2 liter, 300 ml was lost during from metabolism = 0.3 liter.
The water produced = 200 ml = 0.2 liter.
The water consumption = 2 L + 0.3 L - 0.2 L
Total water consumption done by the body = 2.1 liter.
Thus, the answer is 2.1 liter.
Answer:
<h2>Methylmercury is an organic shape of mercury. It is very toxic and is also the culprit in mercury poisoning. Methylmercury can be easily absorbed into the living tissue of aquatic organisms. This can cause disease and also can be fatal.</h2>
The assessment findings by the nurse which indicates that the patient with sickle cell disease is experiencing a liver complication is:
Creatinine: 2.9 mg/dL
The correct answer choice is option b.
<h3>How the rise in creatinine level result to liver problems</h3>
The rise in creatinine in the body usually, frequently and most of the time lowers homocysteine production in liver cells, when this happens, it exposes the liver to a dangerous health condition which occurs as a result of diminishing fat accumulation. When this happens, it damages the liver.
In conclusion, we can now confirm that an elevation in the creatinine levels causes health issues to the liver
Complete question:
the nurse is caring for a client with an exacerbation of sickle cell disease (scd). which finding indicates to the nurse that the client is experiencing a liver complication from this condition?
a. White blood cell count: 12,000/mm3
b. Creatinine: 2.9 mg/dL
c. Hematocrit: 30%
d. Sodium: 147 mEq/L
Read more on sickle cell:
brainly.com/question/21354134
#SPJ1
Answer:
One of the conditions that she describe
was induced heart failure, which is basically a “broken heart.” She says that human doctors apparently discovered that this is true in humans around 2000. However, veterinarians had recognized this in the earlier 1970s. This just goes to show that there are more correlations between the two than people realize and could help substantially.
Do you find Dr. Natterson-Horowitz's argument that physicians can learn a lot from veterinarians convincing? What part of her argument is, to you, especially strong or
weak?
I think that her argument is extremely convincing and I definitely agree with her. Her statements about how she performed
the same functions on both humans and other animals helped portray the argument she was making but was also a strong point. I also thought that her naming the three
conditions was very strong
Explanation:
The main<u> </u><u>difference</u><u> between a</u><u> TIA</u> (transient ischemic attack) <u>and </u><u>RIND</u> (Reversible ischemic neurologic deficit) is the time duration taken for reversal of symptoms.
Explanation:
The symptoms of TIA can last for about 24 hours and settle within a day. RIND lasts for more than 24 hours and clears within a week or few weeks. This means that RIND is actually a mini version of TIA.
<u>Perspective of the paramedic:</u>
Since both the conditions exhibits acute mini stroke-like conditions with reversal of symptoms, the perspective of the paramedic will be the same for both TIA and RIND.
The paramedics in the field should conduct GCS and FAST tests, detect stroke and its damage caused, should obtain other basic information at the field, and administer basic neuroprotective treatment modalities to save the patient from further damage.
<u>In the hospital,</u> for both TIA and RIND, the primary stroke management is to restore the blood supply to the brain through anticlotting agents like tPA injections or endovascular procedures
. The treatment can vary later according to the severity of the stroke.
