Is 143 and 63 relatively prime numberd

Mathematics

1 answer:

Igoryamba3 years ago

4 0

Yes 143 and 63 are relatively prime because they have no prime factors in common

brainliest answer please?

You might be interested in

Trina has 72 collector’s stamps. She puts 43 of the stamps into a stamp book. How many stamps are left?

sattari [20]

Hi! For this question all you have to do is subtract 43 from 72.

72 - 43 = 29

Trina had 29 stamps left.

Hope this helps! Happy Thanksgiving!

7 0

3 years ago

PLEASE HELP ME WITH THIS QUESTION!!! 20 PTS. PLZZ.

EleoNora [17]

The appropriate descriptors of geometric sequences are ...

... B) Geometric sequences have a common ratio between terms.

... D) Geometric sequences are restricted to the domain of natural numbers.

_____

The sequences may increase, decrease, or alternate between increasing and decreasing.

If the first term is zero, then all terms are zero—not a very interesting sequence. Since division by zero is undefined, the common ration of such a sequence would be undefined.

There are some sequences that have a common difference between particular pairs of terms. However, a sequence that has the same difference between all adjacent pairs of terms is called an arithmetic sequence, not a geometric sequence.

Any sequence has terms numbered by the counting numbers: term 1, term 2, term 3, and so on. Hence the domain is those natural numbers. The relation describing a geometric sequence is an exponential relation. It can be evaluated for values of the independent variable that are not natural numbers, but now we're talking exponential function, not geometric sequence.

3 0

3 years ago

65yards and 2feet equall hiw many feet

Black_prince [1.1K]

We know that 1 yard equals 3 feet, therefore, we have:
65(3) + 2
= 195 + 2
= 197
therefore, 65 yards and 2 feet equals 197 feet

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Emma is standing 10 feet away from the base of a tree and tries to measure the angle of elevation to the top. She is unable to g

Vaselesa [24]

The complete question in the attached figure

step 1
find the tree height for an angle of elevation of 55°
tan 55°=opposite side angle 55°/adjacent side angle 55°
opposite side angle 55°=the tree height h1
adjacent side angle 55°=10 ft
so
tan 55°=h/10-------> h=10*tan 55°-----> h=14.28 ft

step 2
find the tree height for an angle of elevation of 75°
tan 75°=opposite side angle 75°/adjacent side angle 75°
opposite side angle 75°=the tree height h2
adjacent side angle 75°=10 ft
so
tan 75°=h2/10-------> h2=10*tan 75°-----> h2=37.32 ft

therefore

the height of the tree is within the range [14.26,37.32]

Part 1) 4.2 ft

the value is not in the interval [14.26,37.32]
therefore
it is Not Reasonable

Part 2) 14.7 ft

the value is in the interval [14.26,37.32]
therefore
it is Reasonable

Part 3) 24.4 ft

the value is in the interval [14.26,37.32]
therefore
it is Reasonable

Part 4) 33.9 ft

the value is in the interval [14.26,37.32]
therefore
it is Reasonable

Part 5) 39.1ft

the value is not in the interval [14.26,37.32]
therefore
it is Not Reasonable

Part 6) 58.7 ft

the value is not in the interval [14.26,37.32]
therefore
it is Not Reasonable

4 0

3 years ago

The average temperature in Antarctica is -70.6°F. The average temperature at the equator is 86°F. What is the distance between t

Zanzabum

I’m pretty sure is The answer b

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers