Use the internet (or your book, if you have it) to find out why the death of Julius Caesar led to the outbreak of civil war.

History

1 answer:

Alex Ar [27]3 years ago

7 0

Answer:

OCTAVIAN GETS TO THE POWER After the death of Caesar, the three Socialists fell into the hands of a politician-general belonging to Caesar's circle. One of Antonius Caesar's commanders, Lepldus, was the leader of the cavalry, and the young but more purposeful Octavian was Caesar's nephew, the dictator's official heir, whose uncle took control of the events. Winning the shackles of power, he was among the contenders for power. They conspired to seize power: this was the second triumvirate (43 BC). The following year they defeated the (Philippi, 42 BC) and then divided among themselves the power over the empire: Octavian to the West, Antonius to the East, and Africa to the Republicans. Lepidus soon faded into the background, and then Octavian and Antonius continued to fight each other for monopoly. Another civil war became inevitable. Antonius relied on Hellenistic Egypt. To the last Egyptian queen, VII. Because of his love affair with Cleopatra, many feared that Antonius E would not appreciate Roman tradition and that the center of gravity of the empire would be to the east. For this reason, the majority of the Romans supported Octavian. The decisive clash took place at Actium (31 BC), and Octavian won the naval battle. He became the power.

You might be interested in

This court is responsible for hearing and reviewing appeals from legal cases that have already been heard in a trial level or ot

denis-greek [22]

The appellate courts

8 0

2 years ago

Congress cannot override a presidential veto of a tax bill. a. true b. false

Sonbull [250]

They can override it with a 2/3 vote in both the House and senate, so it’ll be false.

5 0

4 years ago

This country explored and claimed the east coast of North America:

EastWind [94]

The answer is england..... your welcome

7 0

3 years ago

Great Compromise Three-Fifths Compromise Origination Clause Electoral College representation of slaves in the South arrowRight s

dem82 [27]

Answer:

The matching for this question can be defined as follows:

Explanation:

$1) \text{Representation of slaves} \longrightarrow \text{Three-Fifths Compromise in the South}\\\\ 2)\text{State representation in} \longrightarrow \text{Great Compromise the legislature}\\\\ 3) \text{Introduction of revenue} \longrightarrow \text{Origination Clause bills}\\\\ 4) \text{Concern over the presidential} \longrightarrow \text{Electoral College election}$

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

In this passage, Hobbes discusses the nature of the government that people create with their social contract.

kherson [118]

Answer:

<h2>be completely powerful</h2>

Further details:

Thomas Hobbes published a famous work called Leviathan in 1651. The title "Leviathan" comes from a biblical word for a great and mighty beast. Hobbes believed government is formed by people for the sake of their personal security and stability in society. In Hobbes' view, once the people put a king (or other leader in power), then that leader needs to have supreme power (like a great and mighty beast). Hobbes' view of the natural state of human beings without a government held that people are too divided and too volatile as individuals -- everyone looking out for his own interests. So for security and stability, authority and the power of the law needs to be in the hands of a powerful ruler like a king or queen. And so people willingly enter a "social contract" in which they live under a government that provides stability and security for society.

Probably the most famous set of lines from Hobbes' Leviathan book describes what he saw as the natural state of human affairs without government -- one in which every individual had freedom, but that meant it was a situation of "war of all against all," or we might say, every man for himself. Hobbes wrote:

In such condition, there is no place for industry; because the fruit thereof is uncertain: and consequently no culture of the earth; no navigation, nor use of the commodities that may be imported by sea; no commodious building; no instruments of moving, and removing, such things as require much force; no knowledge of the face of the earth; no account of time; no arts; no letters; no society; and which is worst of all, continual fear, and danger of violent death; and the life of man, solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short.

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers