A decline<span> in land productivity would easily have led to famine. The other explanation is that the people of Great </span>Zimbabwe<span> had to move in order to maximise their exploitation of the gold trade network. By 1500 the site of Great </span>Zimbabwe<span> was abandoned.</span>
The answer is, To argue for, there's the obvious, which is that the colonists didn't
like their lack of voice within British Parliament. They also didn't
like how Britain was treating other colonies, what would become Canada
for instance, with similar laws and codes seen in the US colonies. You
could also argue that it was a more financial decision, as the taxes
placed upon the colonies and the restrictions on trade were hurting
American businesses. Honestly, an argument combining the two would
probably be more rounded.
The colonist believed they would be wealthy by the amount of land they owned
Answer:
Though, like all things in life, it did come to an end, the resulting outcome has been labeled both a success and a failure. When Reconstruction began in 1865, a broken America had just finished fighting the Civil War. In all respects, Reconstruction was mainly just that.
Explanation:
1: Build larger armies
2: Introduce new government officials
3: increases taxes