Answer:
The definition would be defined in the clarification portion below, according to the particular context.
Explanation:
- Even before managers accomplish diversification besides trying to create a conglomerate whilst also buying other corporations, it is almost always accomplished at a premium surrounded by white market rates because once shareholders could effectively achieve consolidation according to their own besides investing money throughout multiple organizations.
- Although it may be more difficult to accurately determine productivity in a conglomerate, authority costs will be lower as well as assets might well be apportioned around through segments incompetently.
Answer:
At 6% $3,529.412 will be invested
At 11% $6,470.588 will be invested
Explanation:
Let x be the investment for 6% stock
And (10,000-x) is the investment it 11% stock
Let I be interest earned on both investments.
Using the formula
Principal(p)= Interest(I)*Rate(r)*Time(t)
p/RT= I
So considering both investments
x/(6%*1)= (10,000-x)/(11%*1)
x/0.06= (10,000-x)/0.11
Cross-multiply
0.11x= 0.06(10,000-x)
0.11x= 600- 0.06x
Rearranging
0.11x+ 0.06x= 600
0.17x= 600
x= 600/0.17= 3,529.412 amount invested at 6%
Amount invested at 11%= 10,000-3,529.412
= 6,470.588
Answer:
Option A. The two-way flow of communication between a buyer and seller, often in a face-to-face encounter, designed to influence a person’s or group’s purchase decision.
Explanation:
The reason is that the personal selling is the face to face selling which means two way flow of communication is necessary. The seller will use his marketing exprience to influence the buyer which results in greater sales and customer satisfaction. So it is the face to face selling method which most of the companies opt and this way of selling is known as personal selling.
Answer:
c. Contacting me by December 1 about your support of this new benefits plan will allow me to present this proposal at the next strategic planning session.
Explanation:
The closing for a request should indicate a deadline for receiver, which can help to engage receiver in sender’s process.
Even though in this scenario, the sender is requesting for a support which might be not receiver’s responsibility to accept the benefit plan, but the sender can smartly appreciate the receiver if he can have the support by December 1.
I suppose with this closing in an email, receiver will put this mail in his working calendar or prioritized list if he really care and want to support this plan.
