The conclusion that we can draw is that a. Twain believed the United States did not have a right to the territories it held overseas.
<h3>What were Twain's views on imperialism?</h3><h3 />
The relevant excerpt is not attached but the answer can be inferred based on Twain's historical views.
Mark Twain was against American imperialism and believed that the U.S. should not inflict upon others, what the British had inflicted on them.
He would therefore most likely believe that the U.S. did not have a right to the foreign lands it possessed.
Find out more on Mark Twain at brainly.com/question/11926015.
#SPJ1
If there’s an option about opposite angles, then I would say that’s it
Answer:
RANCHING IN SPANISH TEXAS. Livestock was brought to Texas in most of the early entradas, or colonization attempts, including, for instance, those of José de Escandón. ... Each mission had a ranch located some distance from the compound, and missions received land grants from the king of Spain to conduct their activities.
Explanation:
:) plz ( u know)
Answer:
A by causing real median household incomes to decline
C by limiting consumer choice
Explanation:
Negative effects of trade barriers (protectionism) policies include the following:
- weakening competition in the domestic market, and, consequently, incentives to improve production decsrease;
- the welfare of the population is decreasing due the rise in price of imported goods and the relative high cost of domestic goods, the deterioration of the quality of domestic goods, and the restriction of the freedom of choice of consumers;
- the country will suffer large losses due to the non-use of the absolute and relative advantages of the international division of labor and exchange.
This is confirmed, in particular, by the fact that after the Second World War, the gradual removal of trade barriers, such as tariffs and quotas, stimulated growth and increased the level of welfare wherever this happened, partly due to the expansion of the choice of goods for the population at lower prices. More importantly, trade also had a powerful beneficial effect on productivity, that is, on the efficient use of world resources for the production of economic goods.
I believe it is Partisan. Is this one of your options? :)
