Freedom of speech, religion, right to bear arms, fair and public due process in the court of law, and equal rights of man just to name a few
Because they can be used for weapons and tanks.
The Gibbons v. Ogden case is a 1824 precedent of the United States Supreme Court, that gave Congress the control of interstate commerce.
Under a state law, New York State had granted Livingston and Fulton exclusive rights to use and navigate all waterways in the state. Gibbons arbitrarily initiated a passenger transport business between New York State and New Jersey, and Ogden sued Gibbons in violation of his exclusive business right.
Gibbons operated a steamer that ran between New York State and New Jersey State. Because of this, the restrictive regulations imposed by the State of New York were harmful to him. He argued then that it was a power of the Congress to control trade when several states were involved, so the decision of the State of New York went against this precept. The Supreme Court established that, indeed, it was the power of Congress to regulate interstate commerce and that the law of the State of New York was in violation of federal antitrust laws that prohibited monopoly.
The answer is B. Although the colonists were the same British citizens as in Britain, they were treated very differently. Colonists were seen as poor, unsophisticated underlings that could not think for themselves. The British saw themselves as an older brother, someone who watches over the colonists to make sure they don’t make a mess of things.
Adding on to the first answer ^^^
Primary sources can also be unreliable as they are biased depending on the source.
If comparing histories of different countries, they tend to describe more victories rather than failures. Also, having a picture as a primary source can be misleading as it can be interpreted in different ways. Sources written in the first person can also have their own biased from the environment the author has lived in.
