Answer:
Equality in treatment, Limits on noneconomic damages and tort caps are three tort reforms in state or federal courts that I would support
Explanation:
Three proposals for tort reforms in state or federal courts that I would support are -
Equality in treatment – It is essential to support all individuals who get affected by natural calamities and were not compensated while on the other hand the individuals affected during human oriented crisis were compensated for their loss.
Limits on noneconomic damages – This reform was oriented to reduce the malpractice settlements and premium rates of insurance companies.
Tort Caps – This reform ensured caps or a price ceiling, on damages in case of non economic damages.
The first dilemma is how to make certain that research is objective and not intentionally distorted by the researches values. To overcome the possible source of bias, sociologists stress replication.
The second dilemma is whether to do research solely to analyze human behaviour or with the goal of reforming harmful social arrangements.
They simple do not respond as well or at all to stimuli. Please mark Brainliest!!!
I believe the answer is: unconditional positive regard
unconditional positive regard refers to a concept of therapy that conducted by accepting and providing support for whatever the patient says or does.
This concept is used to make the patient believe that the therapy is a safe environment for them where they can truly be themselves without facing any judgement.<span />
