Answer:Tactical Plan, Operational Plan
Explanation:
A tactical plan is a strategic plan involving tactics and plans to achieve a desired goal or target. For example, if a company wants to be a market leader, then they have to increase their spending on advertising and marketing.
An operational plan is a comprehensive plan used to depict the role of each team or department in a clear context in order to achieve the target .
This plan includes how can one achieve the target, what resources are required to achieve a goal while resource allocation is made by Tactical plan.
Answer:
The response is Option D. New grain crops developed in the Green Revolution is NOT something that contributed to worldwide population growth at that time.
Explanation:
The Green Revolution refers to a push towards technological advancement and agriculturally engineered outputs like high-yielding varieties and crops in the 1950s and 1960s. It was particularly impactful in developing countries where there had yet to be much industrialization or mechanization of food production. Advances in irrigation and the use of chemical fertilizers also helped to increase food production in these areas in the 1950s and 1960s. Research institutes studying specific staple crops were established like the International Rice Research Institute (IRRI) in the Philippines in 1960.
Answer:
be given an additional period to exercise this right.
Explanation:
A group policy is a policy that covers a group of people including the members of any professional association, employee of any particular organization, or society members, etc.
Now when an employee is entitled to have an individual policy under the terms of the group policy without the evidence of any insurability and if such employee is not given a notice period of his right which is within 15 days before the period of expiry, must be given additional time to exercise or have his right.
Answer:
TRUE
Explanation:
In the Schenck v. United States case, the US Supreme Court decided that the First Amendment could be restricted if the words spoken or printed represented a clear and present danger to society. Because of that, freedom of speech is not an absolute right, the government could restrict speech if the the words mean a clear and present danger to society.
