Answer:
city A = 3 members in the committee
city B = members in the committee
city C = 4 members in the committee
Explanation:
City A: 18,000 people
City B: 21,000 people
<u>City C: 22,000 people</u>
total 61,000 people
A seat in the committee will be assigned for every 6,100 people
city A = 18,000 / 6,100 = 2.95 ⇒ city A will get 2 + 1 = 3 members in the committee
city B = 21,000 / 6,100 = 3.44 ⇒ city B will get 3 + 0 = 3 members in the committee
city C = 22,000 / 6,100 = 3.61 ⇒ city A will get 3 + 1 = 4 members in the committee
2 + 3 + 3 = 8, there were 2 remaining committee members that should be divided using the size of the remainders: 0.95 > 0.61 > 0.44
Answer:
$3,900
Explanation:
The computation of the inventory purchase is shown below:
As we know that
Sales - gross profit = Cost of goods sold
$8,200 - $5,300 = Cost of goods sold
So, the cost of goods sold is $2,900
Now the cost of goods sold is
Cost of goods sold = Opening stock + purchase made - ending stock
$2,900 = $1,100 + purchase made - $2,100
$2,900 = -$1,000 + purchase made
So, the purchase made is
= $2,900 + $1,000
= $3,900
Answer: the correct answer is $210,000. The months is which the service was given were June, July, August, September, October, Nevember, December. The total service is $360,000 which means it is $30,000 monthly. (360,000 divided by 12). $30,000 times 7 months is $210,000.
Explanation: If a company is using the accrual basis accounting method it has to record its earned revenue when services are rendered, even though cash may be received at a later date..
Answer:
$70000
Explanation:
We have been give in this question that a 100 percent of FORcos share belongs to piper. He owns a 100 percent fully. Piper has to include that which he deposited. 7 million dollars of 2 percent
= 7million dollars x 1 percent
= 7000000 x 0.01
= $70000
So piper has to include in gross income her share of FORcos f income for investment in united states property and this has been calculated as 70000
Answer: Party B
Explanation:
Even though verbal agreements are enforceable by law, written agreements take precedent because they are more explicit than verbal agreements.
The written agreement will therefore be followed in this case and according to this agreement, A will be punished for the proposed action.
If A had tangible proof that a subsequent agreement was reached that would void them of said punishment, they should present it. If they do not, B would prevail.
