Answer: If the commercial is TRUE that every additional bite of food tastes as good as the first, the marginal utility from consuming more of the advertised product must be CONSTANT. Option D.
Explanation:
Marginal utility is the additional satisfaction an individual gets, from consuming an additional unit of a product or service.
Therefore, in the scenario given above, if every additional bite of food tastes as good as the first, then the additional satisfaction is just as good as the preceding satisfaction. We can therefore say that the marginal utility gotten from consuming that product is constant.
The process through which a product or service takes root initially in simple applications at the bottom of a market and then moves up, eventually displacing established companies, is referred to as <u>Disruptive Innovation</u>.
In a business idea, disruptive innovation is an innovation that creates a brand new market and price network or enters at the lowest of an existing market and in the end displaces established marketplace-leading companies, products, and alliances.
Disruptive innovation refers to using a generation that upsets a structure, instead of "disruptive technology", which refers back to the era itself. Amazon, launched as an online bookstall in the mid-Nineties, is an example of disruptive innovation.
Disruptive innovation is the manner by using which a smaller enterprise—normally with fewer sources—moves upmarket and demanding situations larger, hooked-up corporations.
Learn more about disruptive innovation here brainly.com/question/17185200
#SPJ4
Answer:
Investors are risk averse, which means that they are willing to invest in low risk projects or investments. In order for an investor to invest in a riskier project, he/she will expect to receive higher returns to compensate for the extra risk. US Treasury bonds are probably the safest investments in the world, that is why they yield the lowest interest rate. AAA bonds are less risky than BBB bonds, which in turn are less risky than CCC bonds. That is why AAA bonds yield a lower return than BBB bonds, and BBB bonds yield a lower return than CCC bonds.
Answer:
False
Explanation:
"Cash-to-cash Analysis and Management" by<em> Hutchinson, Farris and Anders</em> talks about the availability of the<em> financial data</em> and <em>computer technology</em> in assisting a business when it comes to determining its <u>cash-to-cash position </u><em><u>(C2C)</u></em><em>,</em> as well as the <em>benchmarks</em> needed for comparison.
Cash-to-cash analysis was difficult in the past, however, it is easier nowadays. The supply chain is even examined at a broader view than before. C2C efficiency is possible by utilizing the<em> readily available</em> financial date and computer technology. So, this makes the statement above as "false."
So, this explains the answer.
