Let us see it from a cost-efficiency point of view. We have that every unit of the first selles costs 40$. But the total cost might be higher, since there is a chance for defect. On average, on 3% of the cases the defect will happen and it will cost him 500$. Hence, on average, a fence unit from producer a costs 40$ and has a repair cost of 3%*500$=15$. The total thus is 55$. For the second provider of fences, the standard cost is 50$. Similarly, the average repair cost is 0,5%*500$=2,5$. Hence, the total cost per unit is 52,5$ (total cost=upfront payment+repair costs). We see thus that the lady should win the bid; even if you pay more upfront, the difference in durability makes up the cost difference.
Answer: A. Yes
Explanation: The US tax system has built-in stabilizers which help when the economy is down.
Built-in stabilizers are economy policies of government which are triggered automatically to stabilize the economy when it experiencing a downward movement or an unexpected growth in an excessive way without the explicit intervention of the government. An example of this is unemployment insurance.
Now the supply chain flexibility is based make to order strategy, low volumes, low switching costs and low stocks.
5% of 2265$ is 113,25$
Because 5% is 5/100 so 5 x 2265$ = 11325$
11325$ : 100 = 113,25$
Second year cost is the first year’s plus 5% so
2265$ + 113,25$ = 2378,25$ (second year cost)
