<span>
<span>True.
Risk in investment can be defined as the possibility that the investor may
lose a big portion or all of the initial investment or make very high returns
in a short period. Risk which is often likened to volatility dictates that
the higher the volatility the higher the chances of returns. Speculative
investments such as leveraged ETFs(commodities such as gold, oil, silver),
options, venture capital trusts are considered high risk and often so offer
handsome returns or cost the investor all or even more of their initial
capital. It is however important to note that high risk does not
automatically translate into high returns. The intrinsic value of the
investment vehicle among other factors need to be considered in depth to
determine if the investment is worth the risk</span></span>
C. Government bond would be the correct answer
Answer:
1. <em>If this law of contributory negligence applies to the state, then Ramona will receive no compensation for the damages she sustained. </em>
<em>
</em>2<em>. If this law of comparative negligence applies to this state, then Ramona will get 100% - 20% = 80% of the damages incurred in the accident, from John which will be $80,000</em>
<em />
Explanation:
In contributory negligence, the defense completely bars plaintiffs from any recovery if they contribute to their own injury through their own negligence.
<em>If this law of contributory negligence applies to the state, then Ramona will receive no compensation for the damages she sustained. </em>
<em>
</em>
In comparative negligence, the plaintiff's damages is award by the percentage of fault that the fact-finder assigns to the plaintiff for his or her own injury i.e the plaintiff's damage compensation is reduced by percentage of his/her percentage of fault.
<em>If this law of comparative negligence applies to this state, then Ramona will get 100% - 20% = 80% of the damages incurred in the accident, from John</em>
this is 80% of $100,00 which is equal to <em>$80,000</em>
Answer:
Partnership
Explanation:
When you share ownership of a company, you are partnering with someone.
Answer:
(A) Because the regulation effectively reduced the price of cool air, consumers with sufficiently elastic demand might have bought substantially more of it.
Explanation:
If the demand for energy services remains constant, improving energy efficiency will reduce energy consumption and carbon emissions. However, many efficiency improvements do not reduce energy consumption by the amount provided by simple engineering models. This is because they make energy services cheaper and therefore increases the consumption of those services.
For example, since low-fuel vehicles make travel cheaper, consumers can choose to drive further, thus offsetting some of the possible energy savings. Similarly, an extensive historical analysis of improvements in technological efficiency has conclusively demonstrated that improvements in energy efficiency were almost always overcome by economic growth, which resulted in a net increase in resource use and associated contamination.
