Answer:
Option (a) and (b) are considered or correct.
Explanation:
Under the following two conditions, a firm in a perfectly competitive market produces at a point where the marginal revenue is equal to the marginal cost:
(i) Minimum AVC < Price < minimum ATC : Yes
In this case, a firm may suffer a loss but it will be able to cover its minimum average variable cost. Hence, this firm continue operating in this market and if he shut down its operation then he may suffer a larger loss. Therefore, it chooses to continue operating under this market conditions.
(ii) Price > minimum ATC : Yes
In this case, the price received by the seller is greater than the minimum average total cost. Therefore, the firm is able to cover all of its cost of production and earning an economic profit. Hence, it obviously chooses to continue its operation.
The third option is not considered here because in this case, the firm won't be able to cover its variable cost.
Answer:
Inventory TO 5.5
This means Ortiz sales his inventory 5.5 times per year.
Explanation:
Inventory turnover for Ortiz
where:
COGS: 66,000
In this case the average inventory is provided already: 12,000
Inventory TO 5.5
This means Ortiz sales his inventory 5.5 times per year.
Answer:
can u show the case study
Answer: The supply of the loan able funds would decrease and so would it demand. It will also decrease.
<u>Explanation:</u>
With the decrease in the saving for the retirement purposes, the demand of the consumers would decrease for loan able funds. If the businesses also decrease the savings for new plant and machinery, it would decrease their demand for loan able funds.
Because of the decrease in the demand, the supply of the loan able funds will also decrease. But the effect of this on the real interest rates can not be said to be in a certain manner. It is uncertain.
Answer:
Stan appears to satisfy the basic Sec. 911 exclusion requirements for his year of arrival since he will be physically present in France for at least 330 days during his year of arrival. The actual number days for which the exclusion can be claimed depends on the length of time he spent in the United States. The salary, cost-of-living allowance, housing allowance, home leave allowance, and education allowance all are excludable up to the Sec. 911 limitation (calculated on a daily basis). In addition, Stan can claim an exclusion for the housing cost amount minus the base amount (calculated on a daily basis). Both exclusions are denied for the portion of Stan's salary and allowances attributable to his time in the United States. The portion of his employment-related expenses and foreign taxes attributable to the excluded income are unable to be deducted or credited. The foreign-earned income exclusion and housing cost amount exclusion are both elected by claiming such amounts on Form 2555.
Not knowing the amount of the foreign income taxes, and other components of Stan's tax return, it is impossible to know whether Stan should elect out of the Sec. 911 exclusion. Stan may have spent sufficient number of days in the United States on his trip home to need to qualify for the foreign-earned income exclusion under the bona fide foreign resident rules. In such case, he will not qualify for the exclusion until the end of this second calendar year in France. The exclusion would then be available retroactively back to the date on which he established foreign residency status.
Explanation:
